2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With LARS Artificial Ligament: A Multicenter Study With 3- to 5-Year Follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
132
3
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
132
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Dericks [40] described his experience of 220 patients reported 3 infections (1.4%) and 9 ligament ruptures (4.1%) with 83% of patients returning to full sports by 6 mo (and 61% by as early as 4 mo). The largest published study of LARS ACL reconstructions is by Gao et al [41] who retrospectively report on 159 reconstructions. They describe 94% of patients achieving IKDC grade A or B at a mean of 50 mo follow-up.…”
Section: Graft Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dericks [40] described his experience of 220 patients reported 3 infections (1.4%) and 9 ligament ruptures (4.1%) with 83% of patients returning to full sports by 6 mo (and 61% by as early as 4 mo). The largest published study of LARS ACL reconstructions is by Gao et al [41] who retrospectively report on 159 reconstructions. They describe 94% of patients achieving IKDC grade A or B at a mean of 50 mo follow-up.…”
Section: Graft Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By analysing ruptured ACL artificial ligaments, Guidoin et al [5] observed a chronic inflammatory reaction with macrophages and giant cells in the polyester ligaments. In a three to five year follow-up multicentre study, Gao et al [6] reported that seven of 156 cases of ACL reconstruction using the LARS ligament were noted to exhibit graft failure at the bone tunnel, and they found that an interposed layer of fibrous scar tissue appears at the graft-bone interface at the second arthroscopic revision surgery. It was presumed that the inflammation at the graftbone interface might induce the scar tissue formation and hamper the graft osseointegration within the bone tunnel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it is a permanent artificial graft in the bone tunnel, the graft healing of the LARS artificial ligament is the major problem that must be considered, as the healing is directly related to the longterm stability of the graft in the bone tunnel. As reported previously [4,5], the LARS ligament appears to have poor osseointegration with the surrounding bone because of its hydrophobicity and chemical inertia. Often, a band of fibrous scar tissue forms between the artificial ligament graft and the bone tunnel, and subsequently results in ligament loosening and graft failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%