Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the peroneous longus tendon

Kerimoğlu, Servet

doi:10.3944/aott.2008.42.1.038

Cited by 31 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The branching point was located at 10% and 28% from the most proximal point of the head of the fibula in the PL and PB, respectively. Kerimoglu et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2009). Careful incision placement is required together with skin retraction to allow visualization of the tendon ends and to permit the reconstruction (Wang et al, 2009).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anatomic localization of motor entry point of superficial peroneal nerve to peroneus longus and brevis muscles

Lee

et al. 2010

Clinical Anatomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examined the anatomic location of the motor entry point (MEP) and branching point at the proximal and distal points of the tendon of the peroneal muscle by visual observation. Forty-three fresh legs of 25 adult bodies which had been donated to science were investigated in this study. The mean length of the reference line between the most proximal point of the head of the fibula (PHF) and the most distal point of the malleolus of the fibula (DMF) was 33.4 ± 2.5 cm. The MEPs of the peroneus longus (PL) and peroneus brevis (PB) gathered from 20 to 40% (7.0-13.0 cm) and 40 to 60%, respectively. The branching point where the nerve was divided to innervate the PL and PB was 10% and 28% from the PHF, respectively. These anatomic results suggest appropriate areas where to inject phenol or other agents for a MEP block in the case of a spastic lower extremity as well as guidelines for an electromyography conduction test.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anatomic localization of motor entry point of superficial peroneal nerve to peroneus longus and brevis muscles

Lee

et al. 2010

Clinical Anatomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous biomechanical study that compared the tensile strength of peroneus longus tendon, hamstring tendon, patellar tendon, and quadriceps tendon showed that the tensile strength of peroneus longus was comparable to hamstring tendon, and was significantly stronger than patellar tendon and quadriceps tendon [ 21 ]. Some clinical study also showed good clinical result in the use of peroneus longus tendon in ACL reconstruction [ [6] , [7] , [8] ] while other author already used PLT in PCL reconstruction [ 22 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Posterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction with peroneus longus tendon graft: 2-Years follow-up

Setyawan¹,

Soekarno²,

Asikin³

et al. 2019

Annals of Medicine and Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Several study that evaluate the usage of peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction shows good result. Regardless the potential, there was no study about the use of PLT autograft in Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional outcome and donor site morbidity after single bundle PCL reconstruction using PLT autograft. Methods Patient who met inclusion criteria, enrolled to this study and underwent single bundle PCL reconstruction using PL tendon autograft. Clinical outcomes were assessed with International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Modified Cincinnati scoring systems, Lysholm score, and Serial hop test (single hop test and triple hop test) 2-year after surgery. Donor site morbidity was assessed with Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle (AOFAS) scoring system. Results Fifteen patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (11 males and 4 females). PLT graft diameters were 7.5–10 mm (mean: 8.30 ± 0.65 mm). Significant increase of functional score ( p < 0.05) were found two years after surgery. Mean score of IKDC was 47.58 ± 11.75 pre-operative; 78.17 ± 4.52 post-operative, Modified Cincinnati was 48.86 ± 12.22 pre-operative; 79.00 ± 4.82 post-operative, Lysholm score was 49.26 ± 11.54 pre-operative; 80.20 ± 5.04 post-operative. FADI and AOFAS at donor site ankle was 93.00 ± 3.04 and 93.26 ± 4.20, respectively. Serial hop test showed good result. Conclusion PCL reconstruction using peroneus longus tendon autograft shows good functional outcome of the knee based on IKDC, Modified Cincinnati, Lysholm score, with preservation of ankle function based on AOFAS and FADI score at 2-years follow-up.

show abstract

“…These grafts are comparable both in their biomechanical properties and clinical outcomes, although different morbidities in their respective harvesting sites [4], [7], [9]. Other graft, such as peroneus longus tendon (PLT) graft, is being studied [10], [11], [12], [13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional Outcomes and Hop Tests Results in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Patients with Adjustable Loop Fixation: 2-Years Follow-up

Рhatomy

Wahjudi²,

Prasetyo³

et al. 2020

Open Access Maced J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: Grafts are ultimately integrated into the bone tunnels by either screws, cross-pins, or cortical suspension devices in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Investigation the usage of adjustable loop button is inadequate. AIM: The aim of this study was to identify knee functional outcome and serial hop test in ACL reconstruction with adjustable loop button in 2-years follow-up. METHODS: Chronic isolated ACL ruptured patients were reconstructed with adjustable loop button using peroneus longus autograft. We recorded knee functional outcome score using Tegner-Lysholm score, Modified Cincinnati score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) at pre-operative and 2-years follow-up. Serial hop test was assessed at 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients fulfilled inclusion criteria with median age 22.0. Evaluation of functional outcome of Tegner-Lysholm score, Modified Cincinnati score, and IKDC showed significant improvement at 2-years follow-up compared to pre-operative. Serial hop test showed excellent result at 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: The result of knee functional score (Tegner-Lysholm score, Modified Cincinnati score, and IKDC) and serial hop test in ACL reconstruction with adjustable loop using peroneus longus autograft was excellent at 2-years follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2, Retrospective Cohort Study.

show abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the peroneous longus tendon

Cited by 31 publications

References 0 publications

Anatomic localization of motor entry point of superficial peroneal nerve to peroneus longus and brevis muscles

Anatomic localization of motor entry point of superficial peroneal nerve to peroneus longus and brevis muscles

Posterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction with peroneus longus tendon graft: 2-Years follow-up

Functional Outcomes and Hop Tests Results in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Patients with Adjustable Loop Fixation: 2-Years Follow-up

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About