2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anterior Column Realignment in Adult Spinal Deformity: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If necessary, percutaneous or open technology is used for posterior release and xation to complete lumbar lordosis reconstruction [19,20]. A systematic review by Cheung ZB [21], showed that at each ACR level, the increased range of focal segmental lordosis was 1-34 °, and the average improvement range of LL was 12.7-39 °. In our study, the average sagittal correction angle of each ACR segment was 15.3 °, lumbar lordosis increased by 31.9 °, and SVA improved from 65.1 mm to 29.5 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If necessary, percutaneous or open technology is used for posterior release and xation to complete lumbar lordosis reconstruction [19,20]. A systematic review by Cheung ZB [21], showed that at each ACR level, the increased range of focal segmental lordosis was 1-34 °, and the average improvement range of LL was 12.7-39 °. In our study, the average sagittal correction angle of each ACR segment was 15.3 °, lumbar lordosis increased by 31.9 °, and SVA improved from 65.1 mm to 29.5 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If necessary, percutaneous, or open technology is used for posterior release and fixation to complete lumbar lordosis reconstruction [ 20 , 21 ]. A systematic review by Cheung ZB [ 22 ], showed that at each ACR level, the increased range of focal segmental lordosis was 1–34°, and the average improvement range of LL was 12.7–39°. In our study, the average sagittal correction angle of each ACR segment was 10.3°, lumbar lordosis increased from 16.7° to 77.1°, and SVA improved from 65.1 mm to 29.5 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another review published in 2019 by Cheung et al . [ 17 ] is methodologically similar to our work but crucially differs in that it excludes all biomechanical models or cadaveric studies of ACR, which we wished to capture in our analysis to develop a full picture of how the study of ACR has evolved over time. Finally, a literature review and a technical description were included in a 2016 case series authored by Demirkiran et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%