The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2008.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anterior chamber depth correlated with anthropomorphic measurements: the Beijing Eye Study

Abstract: Background To assess the relationship between peripheral anterior chamber depth and anthropomorphic measurements. Methods The Beijing Eye Study 2006 included 3251 (73.2%) subjects who returned for a followup examination after a baseline examination including 4335 subjects in 2001. The peripheral anterior chamber depth was estimated by slit lamp-assisted biomicroscopy using van Herick's method. Measurements of the body height and weight and assessment of the anterior chamber as inclusion criterion for this stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
24
2
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
24
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Central corneal thickness did not vary significantly (p > 0.10) between the optic disc glaucoma ( n = 78 [2.5%] subjects; 551 ± 32μm) and the perimetric glaucoma ( n = 38 [1.1%] subjects; 550 ± 3132μm) groups and the normal group ( n = 3022; 556 ±3332μm) (Xu et al. 2008j).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Central corneal thickness did not vary significantly (p > 0.10) between the optic disc glaucoma ( n = 78 [2.5%] subjects; 551 ± 32μm) and the perimetric glaucoma ( n = 38 [1.1%] subjects; 550 ± 3132μm) groups and the normal group ( n = 3022; 556 ±3332μm) (Xu et al. 2008j).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As measured by slit‐lamp based optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Xu et al. 2008d), mean anterior chamber depth was 2.42 ± 0.34 mm and mean anterior chamber angle was 38.3 ±16.3 degrees.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations