Purpose: To determine the incidence of Piry virus contamination among surgical instruments used with disposable accessories for phacoemulsification during se quential surgeries. Methods: An experimental model was created with 4 pigs' eyes that were conta minated with Piry virus and 4 pigs' eyes that were not contaminated. Phacoemul sification was performed on the eyes, alternating between the contaminated and noncontaminated eyes. From one surgery to another, the operating fields, gloves, scalpel, tweezers, needles, syringes, tips and bag collector from the phacoemulsi fi cation machine were exchanged; only the hand piece and the irrigation and aspira tion systems were maintained. Results: In the collector bag, three samples from the contaminated eyes (3/4) were positive, and two samples from the noncontaminated (2/4) eyes were also positive; at the tip, one sample from the contaminated eyes (1/4) and two samples of the non contaminated eyes (2/4) yielded positive results. In the irrigation system, one sample from a noncontaminated eye (1/4) was positive, and in the aspiration system, two samples from contaminated eyes (2/4) and two samples from noncontaminated eyes (2/4) were positive. In the gloves, the samples were positive in two samples from the noncontaminated eyes (2/4) and in two samples from the contaminated eyes (2/4). In the scalpel samples, three contaminated eyes (3/4) and none of the noncontaminated eyes (0/4) were positive; finally, two samples from the anterior chambers of the noncontaminated eyes gathered after surgery were positive. Conclusions: In two noncontaminated eyes, the presence of genetic material was detected after phacoemulsification surgery, demonstrating that the transmission of the genetic material of the Piry virus occurred at some point during the surgery on these noncontaminated eyes when the hand piece and irrigation and aspiration systems were reused between surgeries.