2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4230-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anterior and Anterolateral Approaches for THA Are Associated With Lower Dislocation Risk Without Higher Revision Risk

Abstract: Background Lack of consensus continues regarding the benefit of anteriorly based surgical approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of aseptic revision, septic revision, and dislocations for various approaches used in primary THAs from a community-based healthcare organization. Questions/purposes (1) What is the incidence of aseptic revision, septic revision, and dislocation for primary THA in a large community-based healthcare organization? (2) Doe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
94
1
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
94
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We found no statistically significant differences in complication rates between surgical approaches. Prior studies reporting complication rates between the 2 approaches are conflicting [4,21,35,36]. Complications were uncommon and this meta-analysis may have been underpowered to detect clinically meaningful differences between surgical approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We found no statistically significant differences in complication rates between surgical approaches. Prior studies reporting complication rates between the 2 approaches are conflicting [4,21,35,36]. Complications were uncommon and this meta-analysis may have been underpowered to detect clinically meaningful differences between surgical approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…2015, Sheth et al. 2015). This has also been reported in studies comparing the (antero-) lateral approach and the posterolateral approach (Arthursson et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2014, Clyburn 2015, Sheth et al. 2015). Several studies have suggested that there is a more stable hip and faster recovery if the surgical dissection is done using the anterior approach (Matta and Ferguson 2005, Barrett et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masonis and Bourne similarly reported dislocation rates of 0.55%, 2.18%, and 3.23% for DLA, anterolateral, and PA, respectively 49. Sheth et al ., in a large registry study on 42,438 primary THAs, also reported significantly lower dislocation rates with both DAA and anterolateral approach versus PA 34. However, other studies have reported equivalent rates of dislocation for all approaches, and hence, the data are not completely clear 32515253…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%