2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12243-010-0237-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antenna design and channel modeling in the BAN context—part I: antennas

Abstract: The first results achieved in the French ANR (National Research Agency) project BANET (Body Area NEtwork and Technologies) are presented (Part I). This project mainly deals with the antenna design in the context of Body Area Networks applications and channel characterization. General conclusions are drawn on the body impact on the antenna performance for onon and in-on communications (Medical Implant Communication Systems). Narrow-band and ultra-wideband contexts are addressed both numerically and experimental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in Table 2 the variations of the radiation efficiency are 8%, 13%, and 16% at 3.5, 4.5, and 5.5 GHz, respectively, for the reference MSA, whereas for the MSA-BP the variations are only 4, 0 and 8% at 3.5, 4.5, and 5.5 GHz, respectively. The MSA-BP is almost insensitive to the distance between the radiation layer and the phantom, which is an important concern for antennas used in WBANs [13].…”
Section: Radiation Efficiency and Sarmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, in Table 2 the variations of the radiation efficiency are 8%, 13%, and 16% at 3.5, 4.5, and 5.5 GHz, respectively, for the reference MSA, whereas for the MSA-BP the variations are only 4, 0 and 8% at 3.5, 4.5, and 5.5 GHz, respectively. The MSA-BP is almost insensitive to the distance between the radiation layer and the phantom, which is an important concern for antennas used in WBANs [13].…”
Section: Radiation Efficiency and Sarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although very compact (with a height of 10 mm), its main drawback is that it is "protruding," and consequently restricted to an integration in rather thick devices. In addition, extra losses caused by power absorption of the human body, as well as diffraction and reflection effects due to its high permittivity, degrades the antenna overall total efficiency and radiation characteristics [13][14][15]. These physical phenomena have of course a significant negative impact on the radio link performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above-mentioned body proximity effects still exist for UWB antennas, but their bandwidth is so wide that the possible detuning effects appear somehow more "globally" regarding the matching over the BW of interest (although for multi-resonant antennas each resonance can be affected). Therefore, possible abrupt radio link outage due to the collapse of the total efficiency which often occurs for narrow band antennas in the vicinity of a human body (when the detuning is such that the mismatch becomes extremely severe) is generally avoided for UWB antennas [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This antenna achieves a 10 dB bandwidth of about 20 % around 2.045 GHz. In [9], a general design of a wideband CPW-fed IIFA, based on a design proposed in [7], is presented. The shorted end and open end horizontal strips being close enough to the CPW ground plane "patches", their coupling is strong and they can be viewed as asymmetrical coplanar strip (ACPS) [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%