Antecedents to Unethical Corporate Conduct: Characteristics of the Complicit Follower

Abstract

Appropriately, researchers are devoting increased attention to the behavioral antecedents to unethical conduct in business. Prior management research, however, has focused primarily on destructive leaders while little research has focused on complicit followers, especially outside of the management literature. Thus, this paper examines three individual characteristics of followers—impulsivity, authoritarianism, and proactivity—in an accounting context. Two quasi-experiments are conducted to determine whether each characteristic influences an individual's intention for unethical complicity (Study 1) and ability to identify ethical dilemmas (Study 2). Results reveal that both high impulsivity and low authoritarianism lead to greater intention for unethical complicity and reduced ability to identify ethical dilemmas. Consistent with our prediction, high impulsivity and low authoritarianism interactively lead to the greatest intention for unethical complicity and lowest ability to identify ethical dilemmas. Additionally, in Study 1, high proactivity and high authoritarianism interactively lead to the greatest intention to resist supervisors' requests for compliant misconduct. Important contributions and implications for both theory and practice are also discussed.

Understanding the effects of toxic leadership on expatriates' readiness for innovation: an Uzbekistan case

“…The findings suggest that II denoted several elements of toxicity that included for example (a) repeated disruptive behaviors (Grandy & Starratt, 2010), (b) ineffective resources that affected participants' efficacy (Einarsen et al, 2007), (c) diffusion of negative emotional contagion that caused destructiveness within the workplace (Goldman, 2008), and (d) intentions to victimize, bully, and intimidate (Krasikova et al, 2013;Tepper et al, 2011) Furthermore, participants' responses suggest that vagueness, inaction, and tainted intentions negatively influenced morale, teamwork, engagement, and innovative work behaviors. Therefore, findings concur that leaders have the responsibility to uphold an ethical code of conduct, sustain unadulterated intentionality, and practice ongoing reflection to improve (Bowerman, 2018;Hoffman, 2018;Millier & Bellamy, 2014;Mowchan et al 2015;Sergio et al, 2015).…”

“…In contemporary organizations, toxic leadership, an understudied phenomenon, can be a prevalent destructive reality by causing vast financial losses, workplace distress, and follower disengagement (Eesley & Meglich, 2011;Mowchan, Lowe, & Reckers, 2015). Empirical research suggests that the base rate of leaders exhibiting destructive behaviors can be as high as 80%, which can cost organizations millions in lost productivity (Aasland et al, 2014;Krasikova et al, 2013).…”

Redefining the accountant’s personality: success or stagnancy?

“…Finally, and maybe most importantly, graduate students will be new staff auditors within mere months, and the variables related to personality and cognitive style that we study in this paper will not change dramatically in few months as personality and cognitive style are inherent attributes of individuals and relatively sustainable, especially short-term. Thus, in the context of our study, there is little difference between graduate students with internship experience and staff auditors within their first few months on the job (Pickerd et al, 2015;Mowchan et al, 2015). As such, students preparing to enter the accounting profession are the target population to learn the factors affecting individuals' decision to enter the accounting workforce since they are currently, or have very recently, gone through the recruiting and hiring process for a job within the accounting profession (Pickerd et al, 2015;Mowchan et al, 2015).…”

The copycat effect: do social influences allow peer team members' dysfunctional audit behaviors to spread throughout the audit team?

“…Finally, graduate students will be new staff auditors within mere months. Specifically, there is little difference in a student with internship experience and a staff auditor within their first few months on the job (e.g., Mowchan, Lowe, and Reckers 2015;Pickerd et al 2015).…”