Antecedents of professionals’ self-efficacy in professional service firms: effects of external source credibility and content quality

Abstract

Purpose Professional service firm (PSF) performance depends on the accumulation and application of specialist knowledge to find customised solutions to customer problems. However, available research has not examined whether knowledge acquired from external sources affects PSF outcomes by strengthening professionals’ beliefs rather than only by increasing technical competency. Drawing on self-efficacy theory, this study tests a model that links the quality of content acquired from external sources and the credibility of those sources to professionals’ self-efficacy and, in turn, to PSF outcomes (solution quality and firm performance). In particular, this paper aims to consider the case of professional content exchanged through professional social media. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional research design was applied. Data were collected from a sample of 208 accountants, auditors and lawyers who used professional social media and were analysed using covariance-based structural equation modelling. Findings When accessing professional content from external sources, source credibility and content quality are significant antecedents of professionals’ self-efficacy, which, in turn, has positive effects on PSF outcomes (solution quality and PSF performance). Research limitations/implications Self-efficacy plays a key role in the link between knowledge acquired from external sources (professional content) and PSF outcomes. Practical implications This study provides recommendations and actionable insights for PSFs, professionals and other actors who create and exchange professional content. Professional associations may also take an active role by contributing and sharing credible and high-quality content, using, for example, professional social media. Originality/value This paper advances the current understanding of the effects of professionals’ access to content from external sources on PSF outcomes. It provides an explanation of these effects based on the enhancement of professionals’ beliefs instead of their technical competencies, as indicated in previous research. In addition, it is the first research effort to consider professional social media as a communication channel to exchange content that affects the self-efficacy of PSF professionals.

Supporting value co-creation through interaction during the pre-purchase customer journey: empirical evidence from B2B HR services

“…2.1 Value co-creation in professional services firms PSFs are characterized by involving highly expert staff who develop and transfer knowledge to create value for their clients, typically in the form of customized services (Cassia and Magno, 2021). Customers assess professional services based on several factors, such as value as an expected outcome of value co-creation, influencing both their intention to buy and their satisfaction (Aarikka-Stenroos and Makkonen, 2014).…”

Examining the Pathways From Information Acquisition to Preventive Behaviors: The Information-Response Model

“…For instance, using the survey data from 705 respondents in Indonesia, Alamsyah and Zhu (2022) found that higher quality of government information during the pandemic led to higher response efficacy and fewer reported negative emotions. Quality content has also been proposed as a significant determinant of individuals' self-efficacy (Cassia & Magno, 2021). Taken together, information acquisition from official sources during the pandemic is positively related to information utility, which further triggers individuals' cognitive and emotional responses.…”

Adopting relationship trust and influence strategy to enhance green customer integration: a social exchange theory perspective

“…They describe the reliability, reciprocity and information connectivity between supply chain partners in a virtual and real social environment (Guiso et al , 2011; Holmström et al , 2019; Li et al , 2020). When economic outcomes are predominantly influenced by external, uncontrollable factors, buyers appear to appreciate the efforts made by suppliers toward mutual objectives (Cassia and Magno, 2021). It is necessary to explore further whether influence strategies promote or inhibit GCI in two different contexts.…”