2009
DOI: 10.1348/096317908x310247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antecedents for achievement of alignment in organizations

Abstract: This study investigated potential antecedents of the alignment of organizational subunits' processes and goals with the organization's primary goals and therefore with each other. Alignment data of 329 aggregated subunits (7,359 employees), organization‐wide, of a large US manufacturing company were examined. Managerial effectiveness, communication about goals and objectives, and employee enhancement positively related with alignment at a group or subunit level. Alignment, in‐turn, positively related with comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The measure is scored on a 7-point scale ranging from 'very false' (1) to 'very true' (7). Mukherjee and Malhotra (2006) fotmd that the role ambiguity items of this measure should be renamed 'role clarity' and this is substantiated in other research (Beehr, Glazer, Fischer, Linton, & Hansen, 2009;Bray & Brawley, 2002) and tiierefore, for this study these items were utilised because role clarity is of interest. A typical item is 'explanation is clear of what has to be done' (Rizzo et al, 1970, p. 156) and a high score indicates high role clarity (or low role ambiguity).…”
Section: Measures Of Role Conflict and Ambiguity Questionnairementioning
confidence: 80%
“…The measure is scored on a 7-point scale ranging from 'very false' (1) to 'very true' (7). Mukherjee and Malhotra (2006) fotmd that the role ambiguity items of this measure should be renamed 'role clarity' and this is substantiated in other research (Beehr, Glazer, Fischer, Linton, & Hansen, 2009;Bray & Brawley, 2002) and tiierefore, for this study these items were utilised because role clarity is of interest. A typical item is 'explanation is clear of what has to be done' (Rizzo et al, 1970, p. 156) and a high score indicates high role clarity (or low role ambiguity).…”
Section: Measures Of Role Conflict and Ambiguity Questionnairementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Such variables are, for example, market opportunities (Chandler, 1962), product life cycle, market growth rate, and the relative competitive position of the organization (Venkatraman & Camillus, 1984). Also, since there is a lack of empirical evidence on how to enhance employee alignment (Beehr, Glazer, Fischer, Linton, & Hansen, 2009), our study provides insights into addressing this important issue. In this research, we focus solely on internal alignment and more specifically on employee strategic alignment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the considerable research that has documented that the conclusions people make about how their goals are related very much affect their dynamics and outcomes, few studies have explored the motivational and other antecedents that affect conclusions about goal interdependence, especially in organizations (Beehr, Glazer, Fischer, Linton, & Hansen, 2009;Johnson & Johnson, 1998). This study directly tests the idea that sharing tangible and intangible rewards among departments contributes to their conclusions that their goals are positively related.…”
Section: Shared Rewardsmentioning
confidence: 97%