2021
DOI: 10.1126/science.abd2897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antarctic surface temperature and elevation during the Last Glacial Maximum

Abstract: Water-stable isotopes in polar ice cores are a widely used temperature proxy in paleoclimate reconstruction, yet calibration remains challenging in East Antarctica. Here, we reconstruct the magnitude and spatial pattern of Last Glacial Maximum surface cooling in Antarctica using borehole thermometry and firn properties in seven ice cores. West Antarctic sites cooled ~10°C relative to the preindustrial period. East Antarctic sites show a range from ~4° to ~7°C cooling, which is consistent with the results of gl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
80
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
5
80
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In classical climate-forced densification models the densification rate and thus ∆age is almost entirely determined by surface temperature and accumulation rate. Buizert et al (2021) exploit this to infer past surface temperature from estimates of ∆age and accumulation rate. However, our modelling shows that horizontal strain from large scale ice flow lead to enhanced densification rates and should also be taken into account.…”
Section: Implications For Ice Core Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In classical climate-forced densification models the densification rate and thus ∆age is almost entirely determined by surface temperature and accumulation rate. Buizert et al (2021) exploit this to infer past surface temperature from estimates of ∆age and accumulation rate. However, our modelling shows that horizontal strain from large scale ice flow lead to enhanced densification rates and should also be taken into account.…”
Section: Implications For Ice Core Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the TALDICE gas-age ice-age difference (∆age) is established empirically by matching abrupt changes in atmospheric CH4 to the WD core; at each match point this provides one discrete ∆age constraint. A dynamical firn densification model based on Herron-Langway firn physics (Herron & Langway, 1980) is then used to interpolate between these empirical ∆age constraints, in order to obtain a gas age scale for all depths (Buizert et al, 2021).…”
Section: Development Of Wd2014 Timescale For Taldicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ages on AICC2012 scale were estimated to be 9.4-23.4 ka by using the depth and the WD2014 age of EDC (Bazin et al, 2013a, Buizert et al, 2021. (Severinghaus et al, 2015).…”
Section: Gas and Ice Ages Of Larsen Icementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ages on AICC2012 scale were estimated to be 9.4-23.4 ka by using the depth and the WD2014 age of EDC (Bazin et al, 2013a, Buizert et al, 2021. (Rhodes et al, 2017).…”
Section: Gas and Ice Ages Of Larsen Icementioning
confidence: 99%