2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.05.142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antagonist and agonist binding models of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of the rhodopsin crystal structure to comparatively model the GnRH receptor has been extensively validated by our laboratory and independent groups using site-directed mutagenesis and peptide and non-peptide ligand docking [10,53,132]. All known GnRH receptor sequences from a wide range of species were aligned with bovine rhodopsin using "ALIGN2D" within the MODELLER program.…”
Section: Gnrh Receptor Structure and Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the rhodopsin crystal structure to comparatively model the GnRH receptor has been extensively validated by our laboratory and independent groups using site-directed mutagenesis and peptide and non-peptide ligand docking [10,53,132]. All known GnRH receptor sequences from a wide range of species were aligned with bovine rhodopsin using "ALIGN2D" within the MODELLER program.…”
Section: Gnrh Receptor Structure and Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peptide antagonists occupy GnRHR binding sites that differ from, but that may overlap, the agonist binding pocket, as suggested by mutational analysis and molecular dynamics simulations (Millar et al, 2004;Söderhall et al, 2005). Nevertheless, the fact that agonists, antagonists, and inverse agonists may exhibit distinct selectivities toward the active and the inactive conformation of the receptor suggests that competitive antagonism may occur without any overlap with agonist binding sites (Samama et al, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7.36(305) (Fersht et al, 1985). On the other hand, three substitutions of (Coetsee et al, 2008;Flanagan et al, 2000;Forfar and Lu, 2011;Soderhall et al, 2005).…”
Section: [2-nal 3 ]-Gnrh Stimulation Of Ip Production At Wild Type Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a small number of mutations, many GnRH-receptor models have included contacts of Trp 3 of GnRH agonists with the Trp 6.48 residue (of the CWxPY motif) (Betz et al, 2006b;Chauvin et al, 2000;Chauvin et al, 2001;Hovelmann et al, 2002;Millar et al, 2004;Soderhall et al, 2005 ]-GnRH. Although a π-stacking interaction was proposed (Forfar and Lu, 2011), loss of a weak aromatic interaction is unlikely to account for the large decrease in GnRH binding affinity at the Phe 4.64(178) Ala mutant receptor (Fersht et al, 1985).…”
Section: A Polar Functional Group Of the Hismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation