IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision 2014
DOI: 10.1109/wacv.2014.6836002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ant tracking with occlusion tunnels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second challenge is to associate ants in different frames to tackle the “who is who” problem, given ant detection results in each frame. Regarding these challenges, several methods have been proposed for ant tracking, such as gap filling (Fasciano et al ., ), occlusion tunnels methods (Fasciano et al ., ), video playback and fragment correction methods (Poff et al ., ), but these methods could not solve issues such as ant body overlapping and low contrast problems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second challenge is to associate ants in different frames to tackle the “who is who” problem, given ant detection results in each frame. Regarding these challenges, several methods have been proposed for ant tracking, such as gap filling (Fasciano et al ., ), occlusion tunnels methods (Fasciano et al ., ), video playback and fragment correction methods (Poff et al ., ), but these methods could not solve issues such as ant body overlapping and low contrast problems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solutions for automated video tracking of insects in social groups can be roughly divided into two categories (for reviews see Dell et al, 2014 ; Robie et al, 2017a ): methods for tracking unmarked individuals ( Branson et al, 2009 ; Pérez-Escudero et al, 2014 ; Romero-Ferrero et al, 2019 ; Sridhar et al, 2019 ; Feldman et al, 2012 ; Khan et al, 2005 ; Fasciano et al, 2014 ; Fasciano et al, 2013 ; Bozek et al, 2020 ), and methods for tracking marked individuals ( Mersch et al, 2013 ; Robinson et al, 2012 ). The former category has the obvious advantages of reduced interference with natural behavior, unbounded number of tracked individuals, and not having the burden of tagging animals and maintaining these tags throughout the experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although complex social behavior has been the focus of extensive research for over a century, technological advances are only beginning to enable systematic and simultaneous measurements of behavior in large groups of interacting individuals. Solutions for automated video tracking of insects in social groups can be roughly divided into two categories (for reviews see [5,6]): methods for tracking unmarked individuals [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], and methods for tracking marked individuals [22,23]. The former category has the obvious advantages of reduced interference with natural behavior, less constrained experimental conditions, and an unbounded number of tracked individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge in this approach is to resolve individuals from each other and link their locations in consecutive frames during close range interactions, when they are touching or occluding each other. Common solutions to this problem are to employ sophisticated segmentation methods [13,14,16], to use predictive modeling of the animal motion [13,20], or to use image characteristics to match individuals before and after occlusions [19]. The success of these solutions is case-specific and will usually be limited to relatively simple problems, where interactions are brief, occlusion is minimal, and image resolution is sufficient to resolve the individuals even during an interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%