2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41396-018-0335-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ant colonies promote the diversity of soil microbial communities

Abstract: Little is known about the role of ant colonies in regulating the distribution and diversity of soil microbial communities across large spatial scales. Here, we conducted a survey across >1000 km in eastern Australia and found that, compared with surrounding bare soils, ant colonies promoted the richness (number of phylotypes) and relative abundance of rare taxa of fungi and bacteria. Ant nests were also an important reservoir for plant pathogens. Our study also provides a portfolio of microbial phylotypes only… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be done with a standardized global monitoring framework that is recognized and supported by a large number of countries, which currently does not exist. Given the strength of recognized soil taxa interactions 90 , biodiversity and ecosystem function relationships 24 , and abovebelowground interactions 91 , these large-scale monitoring activities and research studies should consider going beyond traditional single taxa/function approaches and collect information on the multiple dimensions of soil ecosystems 28 , while at the same time expanding/supporting surveys to cover the blind spots of soil macroecological research (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be done with a standardized global monitoring framework that is recognized and supported by a large number of countries, which currently does not exist. Given the strength of recognized soil taxa interactions 90 , biodiversity and ecosystem function relationships 24 , and abovebelowground interactions 91 , these large-scale monitoring activities and research studies should consider going beyond traditional single taxa/function approaches and collect information on the multiple dimensions of soil ecosystems 28 , while at the same time expanding/supporting surveys to cover the blind spots of soil macroecological research (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be done with a proper global monitoring framework that is recognized and supported by a large number of countries, which currently does not exist. In this context, given the strength of recognized soil taxa interactions 88 , biodiversity and ecosystem function relationships 24 , and above-belowground interactions 89 , these large-scale monitoring activities and research studies should consider going beyond traditional single taxa/function approaches and collect information on the multiple dimensions of soil ecosystems 28 , while at the same time expanding/supporting surveys to cover the blind spots of soil macroecological research ( Fig. 3).…”
Section: Ecological Blind Spotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal behavior can also influence soil microbes. For example, ant colonies and mammalian foraging pits can alter the diversity and community composition of soil microbial communities across eastern Australia (39,40). In addition to the effects of contemporary environmental factors (e.g., climate, soil, plants, and animals), the effects of historical factors (e.g., climatic legacies) (6,26), and the characteristics of microorganisms themselves (e.g., body size, the ability to colonize, and adhesion) (41) on microbial distribution should be considered (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%