2018 Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-2844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ANSYS CFD Study for High Lift Aircraft Configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Polyhexacore mesh was used for more accurate results. [11,12] and uniform prism layer was applied to the building model shown in Figure 3. Using the y+ value of 200, the first cell height was calculated to be 0.01 mm.…”
Section: Methodology Model Geometry Computational Domain and Building Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyhexacore mesh was used for more accurate results. [11,12] and uniform prism layer was applied to the building model shown in Figure 3. Using the y+ value of 200, the first cell height was calculated to be 0.01 mm.…”
Section: Methodology Model Geometry Computational Domain and Building Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for the following analysis, a grid size of 380000 and 420000 were considered for artery models of all three angulations under healthy and stenosed cases. The properties of blood being; density of 1050 kg/m 3 and dynamic viscosity of 0.00345 Pas obtained from well-known medical literatures [49,50]. Transient analysis was done for the models-Artery-30, Artery-60 and Artery-90 of both cases-Healthy and Single-stenosed were done using FLUNT Solver 19.0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the results are aligned with Smirnov and Menter [34], who underline the accuracy improvements because of the rotation/curvature corrections on the original SST k-ω model and the model's competitiveness with the RSM model in complex three-dimensional flows, since it is acceptably accurate but at the same time significantly more computationally efficient and robust than the latter. Finally, it should also be mentioned that the rotation/curvature correction factors introduced here are also proposed by K. Zore, et al [38] in the junction flow simulations, since the SST k-ω option of rotation/curvature correction can effectively decrease the eddy viscosity in areas of overly complex flow structures, such as junction flows. The positive effect of the rotation/curvature correction in junction flows is also mentioned in CL Rumsey, et al , for the quadratic constitutive relation form of Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model.…”
Section: Governing Equations and Turbulence Modellingmentioning
confidence: 94%