1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00058651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Answers to modal and hypothetical questions in knowledge base systems

Abstract: This paper describes a computational model which is geared towards providing helpful answers to modal and hypothetical questions in knowledge base systems (KBSs). The model is an essential component of a more complete model which aims at giving helpful answers to questions presented in a natural language. The overall work touches on formal semantic theories on modality and question answering (which have been mainly addressed by linguists and semanticists), intensionality, partiality and belief revision. In thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…N-COMPAT(G, D k , G1) is quite useful for hypothetical reasoning or for answering modal and hypothetical questions (cf. [32]). Definition 7.7 Let G be an agent, involved in an On-Going dialogue d at stage k with another agent G1.…”
Section: Views Of Agentsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…N-COMPAT(G, D k , G1) is quite useful for hypothetical reasoning or for answering modal and hypothetical questions (cf. [32]). Definition 7.7 Let G be an agent, involved in an On-Going dialogue d at stage k with another agent G1.…”
Section: Views Of Agentsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It builds on the definition of proposition taken from PT whilst maintaining partial information states governed by NML3 (cf. [32,33]) (cf. Sect.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is one of the basic and most important features that distinguish three-valued logic from the classical one. The difference is reflected semantically by partial models (partial states of information) for three-valued logic, as opposed to possible worlds (complete states of knowledge) for classical logic, and the intermediary levels of validity and certainty are naturally encoded in the object language (for more detailed discussion see Obeid, 1992Obeid, , 1996. As such, nonmonotonicity is not added on to some base logic, but rather it is natural and inherent in the make-up of the system.…”
Section: Reasoning With Incomplete Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%