“…Furthermore, in opposition to the well-founded second conclusion of the SBU report that "there is 'limited' scientific evidence that the triad and therefore its components can be associated with traumatic shaking," Vinchon et al flippantly "strongly disagree with this conclusion" by referring to a handful of cherry-picked-but not quality assessed-references, and to deceptive and undefined "clinical experience"-where the clinician never has access to the "true explanation" of the medical findings. Obviously, the authors [1] are not familiar with the GRADE terminology [9] and, in practice, now seem to ignore the detrimental effects of circular reasoning in previous SBS research [6].…”