Answer to Anonymous Referee #2

Abstract

Methane (CH 4 ) emissions from biogenic sources, such as Arctic permafrost wetlands, are associated with large uncertainties because of the high variability of fluxes in both space and time. This variability poses a challenge to monitoring CH 4 fluxes with the eddy covariance (EC) technique, because this approach requires stationary signals from spatially homogeneous sources. Episodic outbursts of CH 4 emissions, i.e. outgassing in the form of bubbles from oversaturated groundwater or surfacewater, are particularly challenging to quantify. Such events typically last for only a few minutes, which is much 5 shorter than the common averaging interval for eddy covariance (30 minutes). The steady state assumption is jeopardized, which potentially leads to a non-negligible bias in the CH 4 flux. We tested and evaluated a flux calculation method based on wavelet analysis, which, in contrast to regular EC data processing, does not require steady-state conditions and is allowed to obtain fluxes over averaging periods as short as 1 minute. We demonstrate that the occurrence of extreme CH 4 flux events over the summer season followed a seasonal course with a maximum in early August, which is strongly correlated with the 10 maximum soil temperature. Statistics on meteorological conditions before, during, and after the detected events revealed that it is atmospheric mixing that triggered such events rather than CH 4 emission from the soil. By investigating individual events in more detail, we identified various mesoscale processes like gravity waves, low-level jets, weather fronts passing the site, and cold-air advection from a nearby mountain ridge as the dominating processes. Overall, our findings demonstrate that wavelet analysis is a powerful method for resolving highly variable flux events on the order of minutes. It is a reliable reference to 15 evaluate the quality of EC fluxes under non-steady-state conditions.