Ansiedad y depresión en pacientes embarazadas

Aceves, Karina G. Sainz; Ureña, Brenda E. Chávez; Contreras, Myriam E. Díaz; Magaña, Mónica A. Sandoval; Romero, Miguel Ángel

doi:10.22201/facmed.14058871p.2013.1.35347

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Using the structure detected and the cut-off points originally proposed by (Zigmond & Snaith, 1983), the prevalence of anxiety was greater than that of depression. This result is consistent with international data (Brunton et al, 2015), and national data (Gómez López et al, 2006;Sainz Aceves et al, 2013;Ceballos-Martínez et al, 2010;Berenzon et al, 2013;Navarrete et al, 2019;Lara et al, 2015;Lara & Navarrete, 2012). However, this result should be treated with caution since in the original scale there is an equivalent number of items for each condition evaluated.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…International data indicate that anxiety is more frequent than depression, with a prevalence of over 27% and 13% respectively (Brunton, Dryer, Saliba, & Kohlhoff, 2015). In Mexico, the prevalence of anxiety ranges between 23% and 50% (Gómez López, Aldana Calva, Carreño Meléndez, & Sánchez Bravo, 2006;Sainz Aceves, Chávez Ureña, Díaz Contreras, Sandoval Magaña, & Robles Romero, 2013), while depres-sion is between 6% and 67% (Sainz Aceves et al, 2013;Ceballos-Martínez et al, 2010;Berenzon, Lara, Robles, & Medina-Mora, 2013;Navarrete, Nieto, Lara, & Lara, 2019;Lara et al, 2015;Lara & Navarrete, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To assess anxiety and prenatal depression in the Mexican population, the Whooley Questions/Help Question (WQHQ) (WQHQ; Navarrete et al, 2019), the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-I) (Lara et al, 2015), the Depression Scale of the Center for Epidemiological Studies (CES-D) (Lara & Navarrete, 2012), the Goldberg Depression and Anxiety Scale (EDAG;Sainz Aceves et al, 2013), and the Edinburgh Perinatal Depression Scale (EDPN;Ceballos-Martínez et al, 2010) have been used. Although these instruments are validated with said population, they present various inconveniences for their use.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Psychometric properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Mexican pregnant women

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. Anxiety and depression in pregnant women are a public health problem. Their adequate detection requires valid and reliable instruments that are also useful for prevention and treatment. Objective. To identify the psychometric properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in a sample of Mexican pregnant women. Method. The HADS was applied to 716 pregnant women between 13 and 46 years old (M = 26.55; SD = 6.56) attended in a public hospital in Mexico City. Results. With a sample of 358 participants, a parallel analysis indicated a bifactorial structure for HADS, identified by exploratory factor analysis (Factor 1: anxiety, Factor 2: depression). The factors explained 53% of the variance and correlated positively (r = .36). The global internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .81; ordinal α = .93) and by factor (anxiety: Cronbach’s α = .79; ordinal α = .88; depression: Cronbach’s α = .79; ordinal α = .87) was acceptable. With data from the remaining 358 participants, a confirmatory factor analysis showed an acceptable fit for the structure detected (χ2/gl = 2.72; RMSEA = .06 [IC .05, .08]; GFI = .93; AGFI = .90; TLI = .90; CFI = .92). Discussion and conclusions. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale has adequate psychometric properties to be used in pregnant Mexican women. Its use in routine pregnancy controls would be useful to prevent, detect, and timely treat these conditions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychometric properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Mexican pregnant women

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Actualmente abundan informes sobre la depresión posparto en mujeres (Berenzon et al, 2013), a pesar de ello, se plantean prevalencias de síntomas depresivos prenatales del 32.1% en primerizas estadounidenses (Paulson et al, 2016) y del 10.9% en primerizas británicas (Partt y Ayers, 2014). Respecto a la población mexicana, las prevalencias no distinguen entre primerizas y multigestas (Ceballos-Martínez et al, 2010;Lara et al, 2009;Sainz et al, 2013), de ahí que resulte importante profundizar en el tema, aunque otros hallazgos relacionados con la ansiedad no muestran diferencias signicativas entre estos dos grupos de mujeres embarazadas (Reyna-Martínez et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Depresión y estrés percibido en una muestra de parejas mexicanas durante el embarazo primerizo

Reyna-Martínez,

González-Ramírez,

Vanegas-Farfano

2022

Pensam. psicol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo. Evaluar niveles de estrés percibido y depresión, asociados a parejas con embarazo primerizo. Método. Estudio transversal correlacional con muestreo por conveniencia, que emplea el Inventario de Depresión de Beck (BDI-II) y la Escala de Estrés Percibido (PSS). Participaron 94 parejas mexicanas con embarazo primerizo de una institución de salud pública. Resultados. Diferencias significativas entre sexos, pero en ambos padres, el estrés no muestra severidad (< 28) y la depresión se encuentra en niveles de nada a mínimos (M = 4.64, DE = 3). Las correlaciones de Spearman entre grupos son positivas y significativas en estrés percibido (rs = 0.26, p = 0.001) y depresión (rs = 0.30, p = 0.001). Conclusión. Los hallazgos revelan escasa severidad, pero según los puntos de corte, las mujeres exhiben mayor prevalencia de estrés (10.6%) y depresión (24.5%), en comparación con los hombres (6.4% y 9.6% respectivamente), coincidiendo con otros informes. Las asociaciones entre la pareja muestran dependencia, por tanto, se asume una relación estrecha, donde el comportamiento de uno afecta el resultado del otro; esto representa un factor de riesgo para la díada. Se propone profundizar sobre factores de riesgo asociados a la problemática de salud pública que involucran las variables del estudio.

show abstract

Non-pharmacological interventions to reduce anxiety in pregnancy, labour and postpartum: A systematic review

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ansiedad y depresión en pacientes embarazadas

Abstract: —

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Psychometric properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Mexican pregnant women

Psychometric properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Mexican pregnant women

Depresión y estrés percibido en una muestra de parejas mexicanas durante el embarazo primerizo

Non-pharmacological interventions to reduce anxiety in pregnancy, labour and postpartum: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About