Anscombe’s Approach to Rational Capacities

Abstract

Reigning orthodoxy in the philosophical study of human rational capacities, such as being able to act intentionally and to reason, is to characterize them in causal psychological terms. That is, to analyze these capacities in terms of mental states and their causal relations. It is against this background that the work of G.E.M. Anscombe has gained renewed interest. The main goal of this chapter is twofold. First, I will explicate Anscombe's philosophical approach by analyzing her account of intentional action and by relating it to the misperceptions of that account in (the history of) the philosophy of action. Importantly, Anscombe holds that an analysis of intentional action in terms of what it is, e.g., an event with certain specific features, cannot provide non-circular explanations. Instead, following Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas and Wittgenstein, Anscombe seeks to explicate intentional action in terms of its form, i.e., the way in which it exists. The second aim of the chapter is to show the import of Anscombe's approach by applying it to the philosophy of reasoning. After discussing two main problems for the current orthodox view in epistemological debates on reasoning, I will propose an alternative Anscombe-inspired view of reasoning. In this so-called form view of reasoning, reasoning is characterized as a tool to drag out implications, embodied in judgments of the form p as following from q. The upshot of the chapter is that concepts of our rational capacities do not depict certain psychological states or processes, but rather our involvement with rational connections that exist in our lives and practices.Many thanks to the organizers and audience of the Women in Parenthesis Workshop (VU Amsterdam, 2019), and to Lieke Asma, Niels van Miltenburg, Dawa Ometto, the editors of this volume and an anonymous referee for many helpful suggestions.

Implementasi dan Intervensi Hukum terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan

“…Berdasarkan fakta persidangan dan keterangan anak, diketahui bahwa PR dengan sengaja membawa pisau jenis badik dengan ukuran sekitar ± 50 cm untuk membunuh korban (Kloosterboer, 2022). Anak PR tidak memberikan peringatan atau mengucapkan apapun kepada korban ketika merampas nyawa Rahman, dan setelah kejadian tersebut, PR langsung kabur dari tempat kejadian (Lino, 2022).…”