2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2019.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anoxic storage regenerates reactive Fe(II) in reduced nontronite with short-term oxidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
6
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The similar levels of aqueous Fe 2+ and total aqueous Fe suggest a negligible level of aqueous Fe 3+ . This result suggests that the bioreduction rate of the Fe 3+ –ligand complex to the Fe 2+ –ligand complex (R1 in Figure S2a) is faster than the abiotic oxidation rate of the Fe 2+ –ligand complex to the Fe 3+ –ligand complex by structural Fe­(III) in NAu-2 (R2 in Figure S2a), consistent with previous observations that IET is a slow process. ,, …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The similar levels of aqueous Fe 2+ and total aqueous Fe suggest a negligible level of aqueous Fe 3+ . This result suggests that the bioreduction rate of the Fe 3+ –ligand complex to the Fe 2+ –ligand complex (R1 in Figure S2a) is faster than the abiotic oxidation rate of the Fe 2+ –ligand complex to the Fe 3+ –ligand complex by structural Fe­(III) in NAu-2 (R2 in Figure S2a), consistent with previous observations that IET is a slow process. ,, …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This result suggests that the bioreduction rate of the Fe 3+ −ligand complex to the Fe 2+ −ligand complex (R1 in Figure S2a) is faster than the abiotic oxidation rate of the Fe 2+ −ligand complex to the Fe 3+ −ligand complex by structural Fe(III) in NAu-2 (R2 in Figure S2a), consistent with previous observations that IET is a slow process. 55,79,80 In contrast to NAu-2, the presence of ligands did not significantly enhance the Fe(III) bioreduction rate in SWy-2 (Figure S3a,d, Table S4), suggesting that the Fe 2+ − and Fe 3+ − ligand complexes did not serve as electron shuttles for SWy-2 bioreduction. This observation suggests that once the Fe 3+ − ligand complex is reduced to the Fe 2+ −ligand complex, it is difficult to cycle it back to the Fe 3+ −ligand complex by structural Fe(III) in SWy-2 (crossed-out pathway in Figure S2b).…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The mineral structural Fe­(II) in farmland sediment was oxidized continuously during the course of 10 h (Figure c), which is different from the lakeshore sediment (Figure b). The oxidation pattern of mineral structural Fe­(II) in farmland sediment was consistent with those of reduced clay minerals. , That is, both mineral structural and surface-adsorbed Fe­(II) were oxidized quickly in initial stage, and mineral structural Fe­(II) was oxidized slowly in the later stage with regeneration of surface Fe­(II) for oxygenation. , Together with the high abundance of clays (51%), it is reasonable to assign the mineral structural Fe­(II) mostly to the silicates in farmland sediment. Contribution of structural Fe­(II) in clays was supported by the production of more •OH upon oxygenation of farmland sediment after removing organic matter and Fe oxides (Figure S12c).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In the case of no-ligand system, a direct contact between 2002 cells and rNAu-2 surface would preferentially oxidize structural Fe­(II) around particle edges . Regeneration of edge Fe­(II) through multistep electron hopping from interior Fe­(II) to edge Fe­(III) through Fe­(III)–O/OH–Fe­(II) entities is presumably driven by a reduction potential gradient, which is a slow process. , Thus, the extent of Fe­(II) oxidation is limited. However, in the presence of ligands, the ligand-complexed Fe­(III)/Fe­(II) couple formed has a higher reduction potential relative to the structural Fe­(III)/Fe­(II) couple. , Given its small size, it is likely that complexed Fe­(III) can access more structural Fe­(II) sites, through both edges and basal planes of rNAu-2, thus increasing the extent of Fe­(II) oxidation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 Regeneration of edge Fe(II) through multistep electron hopping from interior Fe(II) to edge Fe(III) through Fe(III)−O/OH−Fe(II) entities is presumably driven by a reduction potential gradient, which is a slow process. 35,70 Thus, the extent of Fe(II) oxidation is limited. However, in the presence of ligands, the ligand-complexed Fe(III)/Fe(II) couple formed has a higher reduction potential relative to the structural Fe(III)/Fe(II) couple.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%