2015
DOI: 10.1134/s1990519x1502008x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anoxia resistance of cultured multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells from adipose tissue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several assumptions and simplifications were made to allow the construction of the current model, which require caution in interpreting the simulation results and, in many cases, point to important future work: The model focuses on the overall oxygen-dependent behaviour of cell cycle commitment and is not expected to be taken for making predictions at rather extreme conditions. In particular, under severe hypoxia pro-survival response in stem cells is expected to dominate and could result in quiescence to reduce DNA damage [ 9 , 21 , 88 ] despite a few reports showed the successful proliferation of MSCs under anoxic conditions [ 89 , 90 ], which may be due to different factors as addressed in the original papers. The current model only estimates the time required for commitment to cell cycle in late-G1 phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several assumptions and simplifications were made to allow the construction of the current model, which require caution in interpreting the simulation results and, in many cases, point to important future work: The model focuses on the overall oxygen-dependent behaviour of cell cycle commitment and is not expected to be taken for making predictions at rather extreme conditions. In particular, under severe hypoxia pro-survival response in stem cells is expected to dominate and could result in quiescence to reduce DNA damage [ 9 , 21 , 88 ] despite a few reports showed the successful proliferation of MSCs under anoxic conditions [ 89 , 90 ], which may be due to different factors as addressed in the original papers. The current model only estimates the time required for commitment to cell cycle in late-G1 phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%