2014
DOI: 10.1002/jez.1853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Another one bites the dust: Bite force and ecology in three caviomorph rodents (Rodentia, Hystricognathi)

Abstract: Mammals have developed sophisticated strategies adapting to particular locomotor modes, feeding habits, and social interactions. Many rodent species have acquired a fossorial, semi-fossorial, or even subterranean life-style, converging on morphological, anatomical, and ecological features but diverging in the final arrangement. These ecological variations partially depend on the functional morphology of their digging tools. Muscular and mechanical features (e.g., lever arms relationship) of the bite force were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
68
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
5
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the jugal fossa of the fossil is slightly more developed than in non-octodontoids caviomorphs (e.g., Cavia, Dasyprocta, Lagostomus, and Coendou; Woods 1972). Consequently, Prospaniomys would have presented an intermediate degree of development of masseter posterior between that of the octodontoids and nonoctodontoids caviomorphs, which would suggest a relatively moderate force exerted by this muscle (see Becerra et al 2014). Regarding the digastric muscle, it is classified as a mandibular depressor (Hiiemae 1971;Gorniak 1985;LevTov and Tal 1987); a relatively large size of this muscle could be related to a wide and powerful opening of the mandible (as it is related in Carnivora; see Scapino 1976), which could be linked to the type of diet proposed for Prospaniomys (see next paragraph).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, the jugal fossa of the fossil is slightly more developed than in non-octodontoids caviomorphs (e.g., Cavia, Dasyprocta, Lagostomus, and Coendou; Woods 1972). Consequently, Prospaniomys would have presented an intermediate degree of development of masseter posterior between that of the octodontoids and nonoctodontoids caviomorphs, which would suggest a relatively moderate force exerted by this muscle (see Becerra et al 2014). Regarding the digastric muscle, it is classified as a mandibular depressor (Hiiemae 1971;Gorniak 1985;LevTov and Tal 1987); a relatively large size of this muscle could be related to a wide and powerful opening of the mandible (as it is related in Carnivora; see Scapino 1976), which could be linked to the type of diet proposed for Prospaniomys (see next paragraph).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Features such as shortened palate, narrower bizygomatic width, orthodont incisors, enlarged incisive foramina, and a shallow mandible could be linked to epigean or fossorial habits, but may indicate the absence of tooth-digging habits, like those displayed by the subterranean Ctenomys and Spalacopus. Tooth-digging requires greater development of the masticatory muscles, especially of the masseter group (see Becerra et al 2014), as well as procumbent incisors suitable to deal with the substrate when excavating their burrows (Stein 2000;Becerra et al 2012). On the other hand, the relative size of the auditory bullae was demonstrated to have a clear association with environmental variation (in terms of vegetal cover and humidity) among caviomorphs (Hautier et al 2012;Álvarez et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ZM is one of the largest masticatory muscles in the springhare (Offermans & De Vree, 1993), which is unusual among rodents; usually the ZM is smaller than the superficial and deep masseters and the IOZM (Turnbull, 1970; Woods, 1972; Cox & Jeffery, 2011; Baverstock, Jeffery & Cobb, 2013; Becerra et al, 2014). Despite its large size, the removal of the ZM from the FE model had very little effect on the efficiency of the masticatory system i.e., the mechanical advantage and joint reaction force remained largely the same.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Becoming semi-fossorial, fossorial, or even subterranean, could be one strategy for some small mammals to protect from predators in open environments (Ebensperger and Blumstein, 2006). These small mammals usually show chisel hypselodont incisors specific for digging in different soil textures (Becerra et al, 2014). Therefore, dust and grit ingestion for fossorial mammals could have an effect on the appearance, on the selection, and/or on the development of hypsodonty in small mammal lineages without strong relationship with the animal diet, but rather with the long-lasting properties of the tooth to compensate from wearing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%