2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2004.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Another look at the income elasticity of non-point source air pollutants: a semiparametric approach

Abstract: In this paper, a semiparametric model is used to examine the relationship between pollution and income for three non-point source pollutants. Statistical tests reject the quadratic specification in favor of the semiparametric model in all cases. However, the results do not support the inverted-U hypothesis for the pollution-income relationship.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Millimet and Stengos (2000), and Millimet et al (2003), used semiparametric partially linear models for US data, and obtained EKCs for SO 2 and NO x , and N-shaped curves for some other pollutants (stack air releases, water releases, underground injections, and total pollutants emissions). Roy and van Kooten (2004) and CO 2 they find a positive relationship at low incomes which flattens out before increasing again for high incomes.…”
Section: Literature Overview On the Ekcmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Millimet and Stengos (2000), and Millimet et al (2003), used semiparametric partially linear models for US data, and obtained EKCs for SO 2 and NO x , and N-shaped curves for some other pollutants (stack air releases, water releases, underground injections, and total pollutants emissions). Roy and van Kooten (2004) and CO 2 they find a positive relationship at low incomes which flattens out before increasing again for high incomes.…”
Section: Literature Overview On the Ekcmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Studies that find evidence for the existence of the EKC include Baek and Kim (2013); Carson, Jeon, and McCubbin (1997); Cole, Rayner, and Bates (1997); Grossman and Krueger (1991); Hettige, Lucas, and Wheeler (1992); Hilton and Levinson (1998); Martinez-Zarzoso and Maruotti (2011); Panayotou (1993Panayotou ( , 1997; Selden and Song (1995); Shafik and Bandyopadhyay (1992); Song, Zheng, and Tong (2008); Wagner (2008). Studies that find no significant relationship, monotonic increasing relationship, or N-shaped relationship between the measured levels of environmental degradation and income include Caviglia-Harris, Chambers, and Kahn (2009); Grossman and Krueger (1995); HoltzEakin and ; Koop and Tole (1999); Roy and van Kooten (2004); Yang, He, and Chen (2015). Studies that find mixed results include Brajer, Mead, and Xiao (2011);Cropper and Griffiths (1994); Onafowora and Owoye (2014) and Shafik (1994).…”
Section: The Ekc Theory and Evidencementioning
confidence: 94%
“…This paper aims to provide a robust estimation of the profile of the relationship between energy consumption and income, which would help us to intervene convincingly in the discussion for the existence of an EKC for energy. 2 To this end, we use a semiparametric partially linear panel model, which has the advantage to avoid the misspecification problem that may arise in parametric EKC studies as pointed out by Taskin and Zaim (2000), Roy and van Kooten (2004), Bertinelli and Strobl (2005), Millimet et al (2003), and Azomahou et al (2006). To our knowledge, the only work on energy that deals with nonparametric techniques is Luzzati and Orsini (2009).…”
Section: Contents Lists Available At Sciencedirectmentioning
confidence: 98%