Another decade of IDC research

Kawas, Saba; Yuan, Ye; DeWitt, Akeiylah; Jin, Qiao; Kirchner, Susanne; Bilger, Abigail; Grantham, Ethan; Kientz, Julie A.; Tartaro, Andrea; Yarosh, Svetlana

doi:10.1145/3392063.3394436

Cited by 32 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several papers have been published in the area, and several events (e.g., workshops, panels) have been organized in the context of IDC and CCI. First, a similar literature review was repeated 9 years later by Kawas et al (2020). This work analyzed IDC papers between 2011 and 2019 and identified how CCI research has evolved during the last years (e.g., CCI researchers consider both explicit (e.g., consent forms) and implicit (e.g., agency) ethical considerations and CCI papers are now more likely to make empirical contributions) and highlighted how the CCI research community surpasses the traditional standards of ethical research (based on surveying 20% of IDC authors).…”

Section: Responsible and Ethical Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

‘Lots done, more to do’: The current state of interaction design and children research and future directions

Giannakos

Markopoulos

Hourcade

et al. 2022

International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Responsible and Ethical Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

‘Lots done, more to do’: The current state of interaction design and children research and future directions

Giannakos

Markopoulos

Hourcade

et al. 2022

International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…An analysis of the last decade of research on the design of technologies for and with young people has revealed that more research is needed to understand how partici-pation in design is linked to empowerment (Kawas et al, 2020). The third and last trap aims to address this issue by discussing the differences between acts and outcomes of empowerment versus decoration.…”

Section: Trap #3: Young People's Participation In Design Is More Often An Act Of Decoration Than Of Empowermentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although involving young people in the design of new technologies is a key value in the field of childcomputer interaction research (Kawas et al, 2020), little attention has been given on how to engage them in decision-making with respect to privacy and data protection (Hourcade et al, 2017). Child-computer researchers have called for privacy issues to be addressed more explicitly by adopting a participatory and multidisciplinary perspective (Hourcade et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing Technologies with and for Youth: Traps of Privacy by Design

Zaman

2020

MaC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Media and communication scholars studying young people’s privacy often involve them in research in order to better understand their interactions with digital technologies. Yet there is a lack of research on how, when, and why it makes sense to involve young people in the design phase of new technologies and how data protection safeguards can be taken proactively by design. By engaging with the body of literature at the intersection of media and communication studies, participatory design, and child–computer interaction research, this article discusses how youth-centred design efforts risk falling into three traps of privacy by design, relating to: 1) the different degrees of decision power within and between child-centred design guidelines and participatory design with young people; 2) the involvement of young people in design as citizens versus consumers; and 3) the conditions under which their participation in design is empowerment rather than mere decoration. The contribution of this article is a critical, sociotechnical reflection on the challenges and opportunities of involving young people in privacy by design decision-making. The article concludes by outlining an agenda for participatory design within an encompassing empowerment and digital citizenship framework that invites young people to reflect on who they want to be in a data-driven society.

show abstract

“…Overall, there is an increased focus on ethics in Child-Computer Interaction (CCI) [2] and many researchers in CCI find ethical considerations central to their work [3]. They value adherence to ethical considerations that are explicit in nature (e.g., consent process) as well as implicit in the structure of their research (e.g., agency) [4]. In spite of the increased focus on ethics in CCI, a recent literature review on 18 years of ethics in CCI research, demonstrated that while ethics is frequently mentioned, the literature remains underdeveloped in a number of areas, including definition and theoretical basis, the reporting of formal ethical approval procedures, and the extent to which design and participation ethics are dealt with [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%