2017
DOI: 10.22436/jmcs.017.01.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Another class of warped product CR-submanifolds in Kenmotsu manifolds

Abstract: Recently, Arslan et al. [K. Arslan, R. Ezentas, I. Mihai, C. Murathan, J. Korean Math. Soc., 42 (2005), 1101-1110] studied contact CR-warped product submanifolds of the form M T × f M ⊥ of a Kenmotsu manifold M, where M T and M ⊥ are invariant and anti-invariant submanifolds of M, respectively. In this paper, we study the warped product submanifolds by reversing these two factors, i.e., the warped products of the form M ⊥ × f M T which have not been considered in earlier studies. On the existence of such warpe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. If dim(M θ ) = 0 in a contact skew CR-warped product, then it reduces to contact CR-warped products of the form M = M ⊥ × f M T studied in [32]. In this case, the statement of Theorem 3.5 will be: where ∇ ⊥ (ln f ) is the gradient of ln f along M ⊥ .…”
Section: Applications Of Theorem 35mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. If dim(M θ ) = 0 in a contact skew CR-warped product, then it reduces to contact CR-warped products of the form M = M ⊥ × f M T studied in [32]. In this case, the statement of Theorem 3.5 will be: where ∇ ⊥ (ln f ) is the gradient of ln f along M ⊥ .…”
Section: Applications Of Theorem 35mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we assume θ = 0 in Theorem 3.5, then the warped product becomes M = M ⊥ × f M T of a Kenmotsu manifoldM, where M T and M ⊥ are invariant and anti-invariant submanifolds ofM, respectively, which is a case of warped product contact CR-submanifolds which have been studied in [31]. Thus, Theorem 3.1 of [31] is a special case of Theorem 3.5.…”
Section: Remark 42mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, if we consider θ = 0 in Theorem 4.1, then the warped product is of the form M = M ⊥ × f M T of a KenmotsuM, where M T and M ⊥ are invariant and anti-invariant submanifolds ofM, respectively and hence the inequality (23) will be h 2 ≥ 2p ∇(ln f ) 2 − 1 . Thus, Theorem 3.2 of[31] is again a special case of Theorem 4.1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Then many authors studied warped product submanifolds of different ambient manifolds, see [16,17,19]. Warped product submanifolds of Kenmotsu manifolds are studied in ( [1][2][3], [21,22,25,26], [32][33][34][35]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 3.3 of[35]) Let M be a contact CR-submanifold ofM such that ξ is orthogonal to D T . Then M is locally a warped product submanifold of the form M ⊥ × f M T if and only ifA φZ X = −{(Zµ) − η(Z)}φX for any X ∈ Γ(D T ) and Z ∈ Γ(D ⊥ ⊕ {ξ}) ,where µ is any smooth function on M such that Y (µ) = 0 , Y ∈ Γ(D T ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%