2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anonymous Comparison of Various Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Software With Pressure-Derived Physiological Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CatLet score calculation can be completed solely based on the results of coronary angiography and during the procedure within 3–5 min for a trained interventionist and without additional costs, which is in sharp contrast with the most prevalently used pressure wire FFR or its derivatives ( 25 - 28 ). A previous study showed that those with ≥3 abnormal myocardial segments had a reduced 6-year survival rate ( 29 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CatLet score calculation can be completed solely based on the results of coronary angiography and during the procedure within 3–5 min for a trained interventionist and without additional costs, which is in sharp contrast with the most prevalently used pressure wire FFR or its derivatives ( 25 - 28 ). A previous study showed that those with ≥3 abnormal myocardial segments had a reduced 6-year survival rate ( 29 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An independent comparison study [27] was done for 5 software/methods of angio-FFR estimation on a large dataset. The ROC analysis was performed for each method for detecting the FFR ≤ 0.8 and the AUC values were between 0.73 and 0.75, which are lower than the previously diagnostic performances reported in their validation studies.…”
Section: Machine Learning In Stenosis Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is still uncertain whether imaging-based FFR could completely take the place of wire-based FFR, considering the lower diagnostic accuracy in real-world practice compared with that in the earlier phase validation studies. 6 Furthermore, the clinical value of this technology would also be determined by its utility in managing the subset of complex lesions in coronary artery disease, as the temporal trends in patients who need revascularization exhibited increased anatomic lesion complexity. 7,8 To date, few studies have handled elucidating the clinical utility of imaging-based FFR in complex coronary lesions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%