2007
DOI: 10.2979/vic.2007.50.1.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anonymity, Corporate Authority, and the Archive: The Production of Authorship in Late-Victorian England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In attending to the necessarily collaborative qualities of authorship, our intention is to expose the tension between this creative plurality and the apparent desire for, and creation of, a single authoritative voice. As we show, however, textual authority was often multiple and always negotiated and contested: it resided in, and depended on, assessments of individual credibility as well as the ‘corporate authority’ that the Admiralty and the Murray firm represented (Buurma 2007, 18).…”
Section: John Murray and The Production Of Exploration Narrativementioning
confidence: 95%
“…In attending to the necessarily collaborative qualities of authorship, our intention is to expose the tension between this creative plurality and the apparent desire for, and creation of, a single authoritative voice. As we show, however, textual authority was often multiple and always negotiated and contested: it resided in, and depended on, assessments of individual credibility as well as the ‘corporate authority’ that the Admiralty and the Murray firm represented (Buurma 2007, 18).…”
Section: John Murray and The Production Of Exploration Narrativementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Still, a stark depiction can help us understand how passages between the opposing 5. Items in the MLA bibliography indexed with the subject terms "author" or "authorship" were actually slightly greater in number in the 1990s than today, which seems, from a glance at titles, to reflect the state of the response to the Barthes-Foucault disruption. As examples of the discourse beyond Barthes and Foucault, see also Adams 2014, Benjamin 1978, Bennett 2005band 2005c, Bernesmeyer, Buelens, and Demoor 2019, Booth 1983, Bracha 2016, Buurma 2007, Dowling 2009, Fabian 2007, Garcia 1996, Gilbert and Gubar 2000(1976, Hochman 2001, Irwin 2002, Leary and Nash 2009, Nehamas 1987, Rohrbach 2020, West III 1988, Williams 2007, and Woodmansee 1994aand 1994b. Interestingly, "author" is not a term taken up in Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society (Williams 2014(Williams [1976) nor is it in the revised New Keywords (Bennett, Grossberg, and Morris 2005) -although the latter does contain an entry for "audience".…”
Section: What Gives?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…expresses the general principle of negativity in representational politics. (Warner 1990, 43) Obviously, the pragmatics of pseudonyms ("fictitious personae") cannot, in fact, be entirely reduced to anonymity, the absence of a personal author in printed language (see also Buurma 2007, Coleman 2012, Knuttila 2011, Nozawa 2012 for logics of anonymity often specifically opposed to pseudonymity in different nineteenth-century print and contemporary virtual cultures). For example, a nom de plume, which might well be regarded as a kind of pseudonym, involves assuming an identity as a writer without necessarily entailing anonymity at the same time.…”
Section: V: Writers and Speakers: Pseudonymous Intelligentsia And Ano...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I am indebted to Shunsuke Nozawa for directing my attention to the way that being a "nobody" is itself a crucial way to engage in print culture both as writer and as one written about. One might, indeed, look at the process of becoming a famous "somebody" in print culture often requires a prior period of "selfemptying," of becoming a "nobody" (See Buurma 2007, Nozawa 2011.…”
Section: Conclusion: a Stranger From A Strange Landmentioning
confidence: 99%