2014
DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2013.08.0172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomia treatment platform as a behavioral engine for use in research on physiological adjuvants to neurorehabilitation

Abstract: Abstract-The purpose of this study was to create a "behavioral treatment engine" for future use in research on physiological adjuvants in aphasia rehabilitation. We chose the behavioral target anomia, which is a feature displayed by many persons who have aphasia. Further, we wished to saturate the treatment approach with many strategies and cues that have been empirically reported to have a positive influence on aphasia outcome, with the goal being to optimize the potential for positive response in most partic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That said, the studies employing RPM or RCPM (Rose et al, 2013; Seniów et al, 2009) lacked a clear analysis of effects on treatment maintenance and one (Simic et al, 2020) of the two studies examining the relationship between inhibition and maintenance reported a positive result. Therefore, future studies should continue to investigate the potential impact of reasoning and inhibition on delayed follow-up assessment, as well as further explore evidence of their impact on generalization (Kendall et al, 2014; Sandberg et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That said, the studies employing RPM or RCPM (Rose et al, 2013; Seniów et al, 2009) lacked a clear analysis of effects on treatment maintenance and one (Simic et al, 2020) of the two studies examining the relationship between inhibition and maintenance reported a positive result. Therefore, future studies should continue to investigate the potential impact of reasoning and inhibition on delayed follow-up assessment, as well as further explore evidence of their impact on generalization (Kendall et al, 2014; Sandberg et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining two studies did not statistically analyze the relationship between executive functioning and treatment outcomes, but subjectively report their findings. Kendall et al (2014) anecdotally reported that TOPICS IN LANGUAGE DISORDERS/JULY-SEPTEMBER 2022 their participant with the greatest stimulus generalization across semantic categories also demonstrated the highest score on RPM. Similarly, Sandberg et al (2021) describe a case study revealing an imbalance in inhibitory control, which the authors hypothesize may have impacted their participant's ability to generalize treatment outcomes to his untreated language.…”
Section: Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M o s t s t u d i e s u s e d l e x i c a l -p h o n o l o g i c a l stimuli (16)(17)(18)20,22,23,(26)(27)(28)(29)33,35,40,41,43,44) and semantic stimuli (13,15,25,30,31,36,38,39,42) , and some studies used verbs (19,21,24,32,37) . Another study also reported picture naming as the main task used during word retrieval treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%