1995
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(95)00258-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomaly in the time distribution of neutrinos from a pulsed beam stop source

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar in outlook to Ref. [8] where, in light of the Karmen time anomaly [24], the impact on SN1987A of a neutralino with the specific mass (Mχ = 34 MeV) was examined. We extend this work to a general neutralino.…”
Section: = 10supporting
confidence: 67%
“…This is similar in outlook to Ref. [8] where, in light of the Karmen time anomaly [24], the impact on SN1987A of a neutralino with the specific mass (Mχ = 34 MeV) was examined. We extend this work to a general neutralino.…”
Section: = 10supporting
confidence: 67%
“…[25] constrain the ν 4 lifetime to be less than 0.1 sec. 2 Using the KARMEN signal curve [23] results in a small window around BR(π + → µ + + X) ≃ 10 −12 between our result [16] and BBN one left untested. Note that the recent PSI result on a search for the 33.9 MeV particle in π + → µ + + X decay corresponds to BR(π + → µ + + X) < 6.0 · 10 −10 at 95% CL [27].…”
Section: The Karmen Time Anomalymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Our data can also be used to restrict one of the interpretations of the time anomaly observed by the KARMEN experiment [23]. The anomaly is a bump in the time distribution of ν e and ν µ induced events which was expected to be well described by the single exponential from muon decays.…”
Section: The Karmen Time Anomalymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 1995 KARMEN for the first time reported [1] an anomaly in the time distribution of single prong events concerning the time interval corresponding to muon decay. Even with a much improved active detector shielding the anomaly has persisted in new KARMEN data [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%