2021
DOI: 10.1007/jhep08(2021)080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomaly detection with convolutional Graph Neural Networks

Abstract: We devise an autoencoder based strategy to facilitate anomaly detection for boosted jets, employing Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to do so. To overcome known limitations of GNN autoencoders, we design a symmetric decoder capable of simultaneously reconstructing edge features and node features. Focusing on latent space based discriminators, we find that such setups provide a promising avenue to isolate new physics and competing SM signatures from sensitivity-limiting QCD jet contributions. We demonstrate the fle… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these practical successes, ML-methods for anomaly detection at the LHC have generally received a lot of attention in the context of anomalous jets [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], anomalous events pointing to physics beyond the Standard Model [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], or enhancing established search strategies [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. They include a first ATLAS analysis [43], experimental validation of some of the methods [44,45], quantum machine learning [46], applications to heavy-ion collisions [47], the DarkMachines challenge [48], and the LHC Olympics 2020 community challenge [49,50].…”
Section: What Is Anomalous?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these practical successes, ML-methods for anomaly detection at the LHC have generally received a lot of attention in the context of anomalous jets [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], anomalous events pointing to physics beyond the Standard Model [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], or enhancing established search strategies [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. They include a first ATLAS analysis [43], experimental validation of some of the methods [44,45], quantum machine learning [46], applications to heavy-ion collisions [47], the DarkMachines challenge [48], and the LHC Olympics 2020 community challenge [49,50].…”
Section: What Is Anomalous?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GNNs for anomaly detection in HEP have not yet been fully explored. However, recent work [6] develops an autoencoder-based strategy to facilitate anomaly detection for boosted jets, using a symmetric decoder that simultaneously reconstructs edge features and node features. Latent-space discriminators are used isolate W bosons, top quarks, and exotic hadronically-decaying exotic scalar bosons from QCD multijet background.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this, there has been a growing interest in employing unsupervised machine learning (ML) models that can search for new physics independent of underlying signature assumptions. For example, autoencoders, ML models that learn to map data down to a compressed encoding of its most salient features and then reverse such encodings back to their original form, have been employed for unsupervised anomaly detection [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Autoencoders learn to accurately reconstruct data similar to what is seen during its training; however, anomalous signals rare or absent in the training data may not be accurately reconstructed-a property that can be used to detect them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the signal is kinematically sufficiently different from the background samples, the loss function or reconstruction error will be larger for signal than for background events. Such autoencoder can be augmented with convolutional neural networks [15,16], graph neural networks [17,18] or recurrent neural networks [19,20] on its outset, making it a very flexible anomaly detection method for a vast number of use-cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This better performance is particularly interesting as the CAE has O(1000) parameters compared to just O(10) for the QAE. The study indicates the possibility to study quantum latent spaces of high-energy collisions, in analogy to classical autoencoders [17,[44][45][46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%