2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.07.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomaly detection using Autoencoders and Deep Convolution Generative Adversarial Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Autoencoder accepts high-dimensional input data, compress it down to the latent-space representation in the bottleneck hidden layer; the Decoder takes the latent representation of the data as an input to reconstruct the original input data. Therefore, Autoencoders have been used for Anomaly Detection tasks (for instance [64,65]), by comparing the output from the Decoder and the input to the Network and using a threshold, either manually set or learnt from the data itself. If the loss value exceeds the threshold, then the instance is categorised or classified as an anomaly.…”
Section: Antwerpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Autoencoder accepts high-dimensional input data, compress it down to the latent-space representation in the bottleneck hidden layer; the Decoder takes the latent representation of the data as an input to reconstruct the original input data. Therefore, Autoencoders have been used for Anomaly Detection tasks (for instance [64,65]), by comparing the output from the Decoder and the input to the Network and using a threshold, either manually set or learnt from the data itself. If the loss value exceeds the threshold, then the instance is categorised or classified as an anomaly.…”
Section: Antwerpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A three-layer neural network and backpropagation algorithm [27] were proposed to classify cracks, joint displacement, cross-sectional area reduction and fall off on the surface of underground sewage pipes, and the recognition accuracy reached 98.2%. A comprehensive crack imaging system based on artificial neural network was proposed [28], and the crack type classification accuracy reached 95.2% on the artificially made pavement crack image dataset. A backpropagation neural network is proposed to identify cracks on the surface of concrete structures [29].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [26] used GAN networks for detection. The combination of Autoencoders and Deep Convolution GAN Networks for determining anomalies in IP flow is discussed in [27]. The GAN Network with two Discriminators is used in [26,28].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%