2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2960654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomaly Detection in Videos Using Optical Flow and Convolutional Autoencoder

Abstract: Today, public areas, such as airports, hospitals, city centers are monitored by surveillance systems. The widespread use of surveillance systems reduces security concerns while creating an amount of video data that cannot be examined by people in real-time. Therefore, the concept of automatic understanding of video activities has raised the standards of security camera systems. In this paper, we propose a framework (OF-ConvAE-LSTM) to detect anomalies using Convolutional Autoencoder and Convolutional Long Shor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 allows a broad comparison between the state-ofthe-art results and the proposed CAE-CE for video datasets. In the Avenue dataset, our results are better than those achieved by [26], but inferior compared to [14]. However, it is worth mentioning that in [14], different preprocessing stages are applied to the image frames, mainly including optical flow.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 2 allows a broad comparison between the state-ofthe-art results and the proposed CAE-CE for video datasets. In the Avenue dataset, our results are better than those achieved by [26], but inferior compared to [14]. However, it is worth mentioning that in [14], different preprocessing stages are applied to the image frames, mainly including optical flow.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 66%
“…In the Avenue dataset, our results are better than those achieved by [26], but inferior compared to [14]. However, it is worth mentioning that in [14], different preprocessing stages are applied to the image frames, mainly including optical flow. Also, for UCSD Ped2, we achieved satisfactory results, but not as good as those obtained by [12] and [58].…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method combines CNN as a feature extractor and LSTM for classification. [105] explain the anomaly detection in realtime videos by using optical-flow convolutional autoencoder and convolutional LSTM. It shows a better performance than the vanilla CNN or DNN based approach for anomaly detection.…”
Section: ) Hybrid Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duman et al [5] propose a system (OF-ConvAE-LSTM) to distinguish anomalies utilizing Convolutional Autoencoder and Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory in an unsupervised way. Other than the deep learning model, the feature extraction stage dependent on thick optical flow is applied in the structure to get the speed and heading data of closer view objects which accomplished accuracy of 89.5 % on avenue dataset ,92.4% on ped1 and 92.9 % on ped2.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%