2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18010209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomaly Detection in Nanofibrous Materials by CNN-Based Self-Similarity

Abstract: Automatic detection and localization of anomalies in nanofibrous materials help to reduce the cost of the production process and the time of the post-production visual inspection process. Amongst all the monitoring methods, those exploiting Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) imaging are the most effective. In this paper, we propose a region-based method for the detection and localization of anomalies in SEM images, based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and self-similarity. The method evaluates the degr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
154
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
154
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For false positive rates as low as 5%, more than 50% of the defects have an overlap with the ground truth that is larger than 91%. This outperforms the results achieved by Napoletano et al (2018), who report a minimal overlap of 85% in this setting.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For false positive rates as low as 5%, more than 50% of the defects have an overlap with the ground truth that is larger than 91%. This outperforms the results achieved by Napoletano et al (2018), who report a minimal overlap of 85% in this setting.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Using SSIM as the loss and evaluation metric outperforms all other tested architectures significantly. By merely changing the loss function, the achieved AUC improves from 0.688 to 0.966 on the dataset of nanofibrous materials, which is comparable to the state-of-the-art by Napoletano et al (2018), where values of up to 0.974 are reported. In contrast to this method, autoencoders do not rely on any model priors such as handcrafted features or pretrained networks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…copy-move [1], [21], seam carving [22]. Despite the tremendous progress so far, much potential and many more discoveries lie ahead because of the breakthrough in deep learning [23], [24], many CNN-based methods are investigated and achieve significant improvements [2], [5], [9], [25]. However, as we describe in Section I, these methods all investigate individual images and can not provide the source of splicing images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%