2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomaly detection for industrial quality assurance: A comparative evaluation of unsupervised deep learning models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an approach helps to improve the existing models with the update based on critical (boundary) samples [ 67 ]. Deep learning methods, on the other hand, try to build a model on unlabelled data on the basis of labelling provided by typical anomaly detection methods [ 68 , 69 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach helps to improve the existing models with the update based on critical (boundary) samples [ 67 ]. Deep learning methods, on the other hand, try to build a model on unlabelled data on the basis of labelling provided by typical anomaly detection methods [ 68 , 69 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, many researches about anomaly detection have been based on self-supervised [7][8] or unsupervised [9][10] methods for constructing anomaly detectors. These methods typically aim to construct anomaly detectors by leveraging the unknown distribution of abnormal patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each approach can be applied according to the research domain being worked on. The supervised learning approach is known as the machine learning development process, which requires labeled data [5][6][7], while unsupervised learning is without labeled data [8][9][10]. Supervised learning is applied to develop classification models and requires labeled data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%