2001
DOI: 10.1063/1.1354670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous temperature dependence of coercivity and reversal mechanism in bulk-hardened rare earth-cobalt magnets

Abstract: The “anomalous” nonmonotonic temperature dependence of coercivity, reported in Sm–Zr–Co–Cu magnets, has also been observed in bulk-hardened Y–Zr–Co–Fe–Cu alloys with a similar microstructure. The phenomenon appears to be universal for all R–Co magnets (R=rare earth) having a microstructure consisting of R2Co17 cells surrounded by the RCo5 phase. The effect of R and Cu on the temperature dependence of coercivity cannot be simply explained by traditional domain-wall pinning model based on the difference in a dom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this situation, there are islands of Sm 2 (Co, Cu) 17 phase separated by a paramagnetic Sm(Co, Cu) 5 . Then, these magnets would be better classified as nanocrystalline nucleation-controlled magnets [11,37].…”
Section: Case Of Sm(cocufezr) Magnets Based On Sm 2 Co 17 Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this situation, there are islands of Sm 2 (Co, Cu) 17 phase separated by a paramagnetic Sm(Co, Cu) 5 . Then, these magnets would be better classified as nanocrystalline nucleation-controlled magnets [11,37].…”
Section: Case Of Sm(cocufezr) Magnets Based On Sm 2 Co 17 Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nucleation hypothesis has been considered as a probable coercivity mechanism in the Sm(Co,Fe,Cu,Zr) z magnets for the region above the Curie temperature of Sm(Co,Cu) 5 , 550 C. In this case, the 2 : 17 phase would be totally insulated by a paramagnetic phase, and the models that suppose pinning would not be valid any longer [21]. There is another possibility deserving to be discussed: Could the Sm(Co,Fe,Cu,Zr) z magnets, at least partially, be nucleation controlled over the whole range of temperatures?…”
Section: Possibility Of Nucleation Mechanism In Sm(cofecuzr) Z Magnetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative explanation is a thermal decoupling of the grains above the Curie temperature of the grain-boundary phase. 8,9 In fact, these two mechanisms are complementary rather than exclusive and have a common origin, namely that intersublattice exchange is unable to suppress rare-earth intramultiplet excitations at temperatures comparable to T C . 3,10 Second, embedding magnetic particles or clusters in a nonmagnetic matrix tends to enhance the coercivity and may be used to fabricate artificially structured permanent magnets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%