2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.72.060412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous Hall resistivity of cobalt films: Evidence for the intrinsic spin-orbit effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

12
55
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
12
55
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[10][11][12][13] Interest has also been increased by the ͑phenomenological͒ demonstration that a relatively simple intrinsic contribution that is a momentum-space Berry phase band-structure property dominates the AHE in many ferromagnets. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] From one point of view, the main reason for the physical opaqueness of formal microscopic approaches to the AHE is that the Hall current is much weaker than the current parallel to the electric field. No Hall contribution appears in usual theories of the dc conductivity which use Gaussian disorder potential distribution models and evaluate conductivity to the leading order of the small parameter =1/͑k F l sc ͒, where l sc is the disorder scattering length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13] Interest has also been increased by the ͑phenomenological͒ demonstration that a relatively simple intrinsic contribution that is a momentum-space Berry phase band-structure property dominates the AHE in many ferromagnets. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] From one point of view, the main reason for the physical opaqueness of formal microscopic approaches to the AHE is that the Hall current is much weaker than the current parallel to the electric field. No Hall contribution appears in usual theories of the dc conductivity which use Gaussian disorder potential distribution models and evaluate conductivity to the leading order of the small parameter =1/͑k F l sc ͒, where l sc is the disorder scattering length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resistive switching in ferroelectric tunnel junctions can be explained by assuming a simple electrostatic model of a ferroelectric tunnel barrier that considers the effective screening lengths, 15,21 which is larger for LSMO than for the Co electrode. 27,28 The resistance area product (RA) of the junctions is about 6 MXlm 2 in the ON-state (measured at 100 mV), which is in the typical range for tunnel junctions. 29 More insight into the transport mechanism can be gained from the tunnel conductance G ¼ dI/dV calculated from the IV-characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fe) [15][16][17][18], (b) aρ xx + bρ 2 xx (e.g. Co) [19,20], (c) bρ α xx (e.g. Ni) with 1 < α < 2 [21], and (d) aρ xx (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%