“…A much debated feature of HTSC's and of some conventional superconductors [see Hagen et al (1993) for a compilation] is that near T c the Hall effect observed during flux flow changes sign as a function of B or T . This sign reversal of the Hall angle is not yet fully understood though numerous explanations were suggested, e.g., large thermomagnetic effects (Freimuth et al 1991), flux flow and pinning Ting 1992 and, opposing drift of quasiparticles (Ferrell 1992), complex coefficient in the timedependent GL equation (Dorsey 1992), bound vortex-antivortex pairs (Jensen et al 1992), the energy derivative of the density of states of quasiparticles at the Fermi energy may have both signs (Kopnin et al 1993), segments of Josephson strings between the Cu-O layers (Harris et al 1993(Harris et al , 1994; see the criticising Comments by , renormalized tight-binding model (Hopfengärtner et al 1993, andunpublished 1992; Hopfengärtner notes that the sign reversal occurs at a temperature where the longitudinal resistivity is dominated by fluctuations of the order parameter ψ), fluctuations (Aronov and Rapoport 1992), vortex friction caused by Andreev reflection of electrons at the vortex core boundary (Meilikhov and Farzetdinova 1993), unusual Seebeck effect (Chen and Yang 1994), motion of vacancies in the FLL , and the difference in the electron density inside and outside the vortex core (Feigel'man et al 1994. See also the recent calculations of the Hall effect in dirty type-II superconductors by Larkin and Ovchinnikov (1995) and and the microscopic analysis by van Otterlo et al (1995).…”