2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.03.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous field dependence of the inverse magnetocaloric effect in Ce(Fe0.93Ru0.07)2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jiang et al describes the broadening in width and low‐field variation of the magnitude as anomalous in their conclusion in Ce(Fe 0.93 Ru 0.07 ) 2 system not in full agreement with the model provided by Pecharsky et al that is based on a general thermodynamic approach . In our case we correlate the reduction in magnetic entropy with the incomplete structural transition associated with the nucleation of FM domains nucleated around the induced disorders.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jiang et al describes the broadening in width and low‐field variation of the magnitude as anomalous in their conclusion in Ce(Fe 0.93 Ru 0.07 ) 2 system not in full agreement with the model provided by Pecharsky et al that is based on a general thermodynamic approach . In our case we correlate the reduction in magnetic entropy with the incomplete structural transition associated with the nucleation of FM domains nucleated around the induced disorders.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…This field‐induced structural transition (FIST) puts substituted CeFe 2 in contrast to pure CeFe 2 . In the latter case MCE is positive, whereas in substituted material it is of opposite sign ( i.e ., a negative temperature change under application of a magnetic field) and is known as the inverse MCE . Quite often in materials exhibiting FIST, magnetic entropy has a significant contribution from the associated structural changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative slope of H /M versus M 2 isotherms in such systems is found to decrease gradually as T approaches the zero-field transition temperature [3][4][5][6][7]. Such a decrease in the magnitude of the negative slope of H /M versus M 2 isotherms is also observed across the fieldinduced first-order antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic phase transition [8]. On the other hand, the absence of negative slope of H /M versus M 2 isotherms across a field-induced first-order magnetic transition, as observed here, is also visible in certain compositions of ferromagnetic shape memory alloy Ni-Mn-Ga [9], and in another member of the Ni-Mn-In alloy system, namely Ni 50 Mn 35 In 15 [33].…”
Section: H /M Versus M 2 Plotsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…It was found that a positive slope of the H /M versus M 2 isotherm is related to the second-order magnetic transition, while a negative slope corresponds to the first-order magnetic transition. This criterion [2] has been employed for the identification of the order of the magnetic transitions in MnAs [2], various manganite systems [3][4][5][6][7] and Ru-doped CeFe 2 [8]. The same criterion has also been used to investigate the magnetic transitions in the ferromagnetic shape memory alloy system NiMnGa [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An inverse magneto-caloric effect (MCE) associated with the FM-AFM transition has been observed in Ru, Al and Ga-doped CeFe 2 alloys, apart from a conventional MCE at the higher temperature PM-FM transition [66][67][68][69]. In contrast to cooling by adiabatic demagnetization, cooling by adiabatic magnetization i.e.…”
Section: Cefe 2 a Test Bed Materials Systemmentioning
confidence: 98%