2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.90.144517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous Fermi surface in FeSe seen by Shubnikov–de Haas oscillation measurements

Abstract: We have observed Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations in FeSe. The Fermi surface deviates significantly from predictions of band-structure calculations and most likely consists of one electron and one hole thin cylinder. The carrier density is in the order of 0.01 carriers/ Fe, an order-of-magnitude smaller than predicted. Effective Fermi energies as small as 3.6 meV are estimated. These findings call for elaborate theoretical investigations incorporating both electronic correlations and orbital ordering.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

49
208
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
49
208
3
Order By: Relevance
“…An intuitive explanation for this would be that parts of the FS where scattering is particularly strong, dubbed hot spots, contribute little to the electrical transport and hence they are missed, although a recent theory suggests a more involved explanation [58]. In fact, the actual carrier density at P = 0 kbar as T → 0 is estimated from SdH oscillations [37] to be ∼ 3 × 10 20 cm −3 [59], approximately three times larger than the present estimate at T = 10 K (Fig. 4), as pointed out in [40].…”
Section: Fig 2 (Color Online)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An intuitive explanation for this would be that parts of the FS where scattering is particularly strong, dubbed hot spots, contribute little to the electrical transport and hence they are missed, although a recent theory suggests a more involved explanation [58]. In fact, the actual carrier density at P = 0 kbar as T → 0 is estimated from SdH oscillations [37] to be ∼ 3 × 10 20 cm −3 [59], approximately three times larger than the present estimate at T = 10 K (Fig. 4), as pointed out in [40].…”
Section: Fig 2 (Color Online)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far Shubnikovde Haas (SdH) measurements have been performed at ambient pressure [37][38][39][40] and under high pressure [41]. The Fermi surface (FS) at ambient pressure is anomalous, deviating significantly from that predicted by bandstructure calculations [37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] In this respect, as the structurally simplest Fe-based superconductor, FeSe has unexpectedly emerged in the frontier of Fe-based superconductivity research. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Up to date, few consensuses have been reached on either the electronic structure of FeSe or its nematic and superconducting mechanisms. For example, very recent angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) has indicated a small Fermi surface (FS) above T s that cannot be reproduced by density functional theory calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ARPES has found evidence of a large band splitting caused by orbital ordering below the structural transition 10,11 but the resolution of the available data cannot clarify the changes that occur at the Fermi level. Moreover, quantum oscillation experiments at low temperatures have detected an unusually small Fermi surface 12,13 . As magnetic fluctuations are detected only below the structural transition in FeSe, it is expected that they are not the driving force for this transition 14,15 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%