2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10909-018-1870-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous Electron Spectrum and Its Relation to Peak Structure of Electron Scattering Rate in Cuprate Superconductors

Abstract: The recent discovery of a direct link between the sharp peak in the electron quasiparticle scattering rate of cuprate superconductors and the well-known peak-dip-hump structure in the electron quasiparticle excitation spectrum is calling for an explanation. Within the framework of the kineticenergy driven superconducting mechanism, the complicated line-shape in the electron quasiparticle excitation spectrum of cuprate superconductors is investigated. It is shown that the interaction between electrons by the ex… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(131 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5, where Γ ς (k, ω) exhibits a sharp peak-structure at both the antinodes near the X and Y points, with the position of the peak in Γ ς (k, ω) at the antinode near the X (Y) point corresponds exactly to the position of the dip in the PDH structure at the antinode near the X (Y) point shown in Fig. 4, indicating that the peak-structure in Γ ς (k, ω) is responsible directly for the PDH structure in the energy distribution curve [79][80][81] . However, the peak energy in Γ ς (k, ω) at the antinode near the X point is different from that at the antinode near the Y point, which leads to the inequivalence of the line-shape in the energy distribution curve between the antinodes near X and Y points.…”
Section: B Line-shape Anisotropy Of Energy Distribution Curvementioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5, where Γ ς (k, ω) exhibits a sharp peak-structure at both the antinodes near the X and Y points, with the position of the peak in Γ ς (k, ω) at the antinode near the X (Y) point corresponds exactly to the position of the dip in the PDH structure at the antinode near the X (Y) point shown in Fig. 4, indicating that the peak-structure in Γ ς (k, ω) is responsible directly for the PDH structure in the energy distribution curve [79][80][81] . However, the peak energy in Γ ς (k, ω) at the antinode near the X point is different from that at the antinode near the Y point, which leads to the inequivalence of the line-shape in the energy distribution curve between the antinodes near X and Y points.…”
Section: B Line-shape Anisotropy Of Energy Distribution Curvementioning
confidence: 52%
“…Theoretical, there is a general consensus that the emergence of the dip is a natural consequence of very strong scattering of the electrons mediated by bosonic excitations, although what type bosonic excitation that is the appropriate bosonic excitation for the role of the electron pairing glue is still under debate. In particular, both the experimental and theoretical studies indicate that the sharp peak in the quasiparticle scattering rate is directly responsible for the outstanding PDH structure in the energy distribution curve [79][80][81] .…”
Section: B Line-shape Anisotropy Of Energy Distribution Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extended s-wave superconducting gap composed of ∆ dd (k, ε) and ∆ αβ (k, ε), which emerges due to the pair-hopping interaction via the SK mechanism, corresponds to the kinetic-energy-driven superconductivity of the single-band t-J model [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80]. In the kinetic-energy-driven superconductivity, the charge carriers form the superconducting pairs to gain kinetic energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the renormalization of the electrons in cuprate superconductors detected from ARPES experiments is quantitatively characterized by the experimentally measurable quantities [5][6][7][8][9][10][43][44][45][46][47] such as the EFS reconstruction, the complicated line-shape in the electron quasiparticle excitation spectrum, the kinks in the electron quasiparticle dispersion, and the ARPES autocorrelation. Recently, we [48][49][50][51][52][53] have studied the renormalization of the electrons in the single-layer cuprate superconductors based on the framework of the kinetic-energy driven SC mechanism, and reproduced the main features observed from the corresponding ARPES experiments, including the renormalization from the quasiparticle scattering reduces the spectral weight in EFS to the tips of the Fermi arcs [50][51][52] , the charge-order correlation driven by the EFS instability with the characteristic chargeorder wave vector corresponding to the straight hot spots on EFS [49][50][51] , the striking PDH structure in the electron quasiparticle excitation spectrum [50][51][52] , and the remarkable ARPES autocorrelation and its connection with the quasiparticle scattering interference (QSI) 53 . However, the significant coupling effect between the copper-oxide layers on the renormalization of the electrons has not been clarified in these discussions due to the limitation in the single-layer case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%