2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2004.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous control: When ‘free-will’ is not conscious

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Insofar as such reports can be contaminated by social desirability (for instance, to deny responsibility) and other biases, many studies have also used implicit measures of agency, which are typically based on the phenomenon of intentional binding (Moore & Obhi, 2012): action-outcome intervals are perceived to be shorter for intentional actions than for unintended actions, such as when a movement is passive. As described above, previous research using a similar paradigm suggests that suggested involuntary motor responses are perceptually more similar to truly passive responses than truly voluntary movements (Haggard et al, 2004).…”
Section: Agency and Metacognitionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Insofar as such reports can be contaminated by social desirability (for instance, to deny responsibility) and other biases, many studies have also used implicit measures of agency, which are typically based on the phenomenon of intentional binding (Moore & Obhi, 2012): action-outcome intervals are perceived to be shorter for intentional actions than for unintended actions, such as when a movement is passive. As described above, previous research using a similar paradigm suggests that suggested involuntary motor responses are perceptually more similar to truly passive responses than truly voluntary movements (Haggard et al, 2004).…”
Section: Agency and Metacognitionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…As described above, the principal phenomenological feature of response to a hypnotic suggestion is a reduction or disruption of the perception of authorship over one's actions and thoughts (Bowers, 1981;Polito et al, 2014). Despite the prominence of this experiential concomitant of hypnotic responding, relatively little hypnosis research (Haggard et al, 2004;Lush et al, 2016) has exploited knowledge gained from research on the sense of agency Moore & Obhi, 2012). In particular, harnessing methodologies developed to study normal and atypical sense of agency has the potential to usher in theoretical and methodological step changes in experimental hypnosis research.…”
Section: Outstanding Questions and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations