2017
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201604302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous Channel‐Length Dependence in Nanofluidic Osmotic Energy Conversion

Abstract: Recent advances in materials science and nanotechnology have lead to considerable interest in constructing ion-channel-mimetic nanofluidic systems for energy conversion and storage. The conventional viewpoint suggests that to gain high electrical energy, the longitudinal dimension of the nanochannels (L) should be reduced so as to bring down the resistance for ion transport and provide high ionic flux. Here, counterintuitive channel-length dependence is described in nanofluidic osmotic power generation. For sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
139
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
139
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To take the pore-pore interactions into consideration, besides the investigated nanopore, we also calculate the diffusive ion transport through its nearest neighboring nanopores. [10] The validity of the PNP model has been verified by many previous works by us [22][23][24] and other groups. The numeric pore density varied from 1×10 6 to 1×10 10 pores/cm 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To take the pore-pore interactions into consideration, besides the investigated nanopore, we also calculate the diffusive ion transport through its nearest neighboring nanopores. [10] The validity of the PNP model has been verified by many previous works by us [22][23][24] and other groups. The numeric pore density varied from 1×10 6 to 1×10 10 pores/cm 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…[10,23] By reducing the diameter of the model nanopores from 32 to 20 nm, the power density monotonously grows up with the increasing pore density (Figure 5a). The charge selectivity and ICP effect are related to the geometry of the nanopores.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we investigate the NSGP with a pH‐regulated (e.g., alumina) nanopore by adopting the model composed of the multi‐ion PNP and Navier–Stokes (NS) equations (see detail in Supporting Information). In contrast to the existing works, the present model takes into account the multicomponent ionic species, chemical equilibrium reactions on the pore wall, and diffusioosmotic flow, and its applicability is validated by the existing experimental data of the osmotic current, induced by the salinity gradient, in a single BNNT (Figure S1, Supporting Information). As will be shown later, we, for the first time, report the anomalous pH‐dependent NSGP behaviors; that is, the nanopore having higher surface charge density can exhibit worse NSGP performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In addition to experimental efforts, many simulation works have been made to understand clearly fundamental mechanisms that are helpful for explaining experimental findings as well as providing guidelines to the design of next‐generation, high‐performance NSGP systems . In these simulations, the well‐known Poisson–Nernst–Planck (PNP) equations were used along with the generalized assumption of a constant surface charge density on the nanopore wall . This implies that the surface charge density is a prescribed parameter, instead of being obtained as functions of the material and solution properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38] However, in a recent study, Cao et al found that, for short-channellength nanopores (L < 400 nm), the generated electric power decreases on reducing the pore channel length, showing anomalous pore-channel-length dependence. [39] The excessively short pore length induces strong ion concentration polarization, particularly at the low-concentration end, which eventually weakens the charge selectivity of the nanopores. [40] Therefore, the optimal pore length should be in the range of 400 to 1000 nm.…”
Section: Energy Conversion In 1d Nanofluidic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%