“…Therefore, successful incorporation of Mg atoms into the ZnO host matrix leads to a wider band gap for ZnO since the electronegativity of Mg (1.23) is lower than that of Zn (1.66), which gives rise to an increase in the probability of formation of points defects like V Zn , Zn i , and O i . Compared with ZnO rods, 2 at.% and 4 at.% Mg-doped ZnO samples include more V Zn , Zn i , and O i defects (will be discussed in the PL section) as seen in Figure 8, which shows an enhancement in the band gap of ZnO [30]. However, with a further increase in the doping amount up to 6 at.% Mg, the band gap value of ZnO decreases to 3.22 eV, which could be attributed to the reduction in the population of V o defects as displayed in Figure 8.…”