2005
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-5-657-2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalies of LF signal during seismic activity in November–December 2004

Abstract: Abstract.A signal transmitted by Japan Time Standard LF station (40 kHz, Fukushima prefecture) and recorded in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatski (Russia) is analyzed during a time interval from 1 July 2004 till 24 January 2005. This interval is characterized by quiet seismic conditions up to the beginning of November, but rather strong seismic activity occurs in November and December not far from Hokkaido (Japan) and in the region of northern Kuril Islands. There were three series of earthquakes with M=5.6-7.1 in a zon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The next LF anomalies were observed before earthquakes December, 18 and 21 (M=5.8 and M=5.6). During the whole period of seismic activity a significant shift in terminator times was also evident (in detail Rozhnoi et al, 2005).…”
Section: Observation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The next LF anomalies were observed before earthquakes December, 18 and 21 (M=5.8 and M=5.6). During the whole period of seismic activity a significant shift in terminator times was also evident (in detail Rozhnoi et al, 2005).…”
Section: Observation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As to magnetically disturbed days the shift in lower frequencies, typical for seismically disturbed days, is not revealed (Rozhnoi et al, 2005(Rozhnoi et al, , 2006.…”
Section: Observation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More precisely, it was verified that the epicenter is inside the 5th Fresnel zone of the FR-Bari path. It must be noted that the quoted zone is considered to be the most sensitive to the seismo-atmospheric effects (Hayakawa et al, 1996;Molchanov and Hayakawa, 1998;Rozhnoi et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In last years seismic disturbances in VLF (3-30 kHz)/LF (low band, 30-80 kHz) radio signals, as well as in LF (high band, 150-300 kHz) radio broadcasts, have been presented (Biagi et al, 2001a, b;Biagi and Hayakawa, 2002;Gufeld et al, 1992;Hayakawa and Sato, 1994;Hayakawa et al, 1996Hayakawa et al, , 2006Molchanov and Hayakawa, 1998;Rozhnoi et al, 2005;Rozhnoi et al, 2006a, b). Recently, some possible seismic disturbances revealed by VLF radio signals collected on board of the French DEMETER satellite, were presented by Molchanov et al (2006) and Rozhnoi et al (2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%