2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-019-03558-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalies in Time-Ordered Products and Applications to the BV–BRST Formulation of Quantum Gauge Theories

Abstract: We show that every (graded) derivation on the algebra of free quantum fields and their Wick powers in curved spacetimes gives rise to a set of anomalous Ward identities for time-ordered products, with an explicit formula for their classical limit. We study these identities for the Koszul-Tate and the full BRST differential in the BV-BRST formulation of perturbatively interacting quantum gauge theories, and clarify the relation to previous results. In particular, we show that the quantum BRST differential, the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(265 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since in the Breitenlohner-Maison scheme, the quantum action principle holds [25,29,35], it follows from the results of algebraic renormalization (both in flat [50,51] and curved [52][53][54] spacetimes) that it is always possible to add finite counterterms to the action to cancel spurious non-covariant terms that arise from the breaking of n-dimensional Lorentz covariance. In this way, the same criterion for the appearance of anomalies holds as in any other consistent scheme, namely that anomalies are non-trivial solutions of the Wess-Zumino consistency conditions [55], or more general, elements of a certain cohomology class of the BRST differential [50,51,56], which for diffeomorphisms is empty in four dimensions [57] (except for possible topological terms that are relevant here).…”
Section: The Modified Breitenlohner-maison Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since in the Breitenlohner-Maison scheme, the quantum action principle holds [25,29,35], it follows from the results of algebraic renormalization (both in flat [50,51] and curved [52][53][54] spacetimes) that it is always possible to add finite counterterms to the action to cancel spurious non-covariant terms that arise from the breaking of n-dimensional Lorentz covariance. In this way, the same criterion for the appearance of anomalies holds as in any other consistent scheme, namely that anomalies are non-trivial solutions of the Wess-Zumino consistency conditions [55], or more general, elements of a certain cohomology class of the BRST differential [50,51,56], which for diffeomorphisms is empty in four dimensions [57] (except for possible topological terms that are relevant here).…”
Section: The Modified Breitenlohner-maison Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since in the Breitenlohner-Maison scheme, the quantum action principle holds [25,29,35], it follows from the results of algebraic renormalization (both in flat [50,51] and curved [52][53][54] spacetimes) that it is always possible to add finite counterterms to the action to cancel spurious non-covariant terms that arise from the breaking of ndimensional Lorentz covariance. In this way, the same criterion for the appearance of anomalies holds as in any other consistent scheme, namely that anomalies are nontrivial solutions of the Wess-Zumino consistency conditions [55], or more general, elements of a certain cohomology class of the BRST differential [50,51,56], which for diffeomorphisms is empty in four dimensions [57] (except for possible topological terms that are relevant here).…”
Section: The Modified Breitenlohner-maison Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, an interacting field F int A = T int A (F ) is gauge invariant if qF = 0. Furthermore, given F of ghost number 0 and fulfilling qF = 0, one may supplement it with "contact terms" to F = F + C(e F ⊗ ) such that F fulfills (75) in the sense of power series in F [56].…”
Section: F ≈ G ⇔ F − G ∈ Jāmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We only use it in the form [Q int A , −] of the on-shell interacting BRST differential. One could equally well work with the off-shell interacting BRST differentialŝ recently constructed in [56] (which does not require compact Cauchy surfaces). For non-compact Cauchy surfaces, the construction of the cutoff functions needed, for example in Theorem 3.13 or Theorem 3.8, becomes slightly more involved, but apart from the fact that the existence of Hadamard states for non-compact Cauchy surfaces has not been proven in full generality [51], our conclusions also hold for non-compact Cauchy surfaces (with the obvious replacements of [Q int A , −] byŝ).…”
Section: Summary Of Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation