2011
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalies at the Borderline of Awareness: An ERP Study

Abstract: Behaviorally, some semantic anomalies, such as those used to demonstrate N400 effects in ERPs, are easy to detect. However, some, such as "after an air crash, where should the survivors be buried?" are difficult. The difference has to do with the extent to which the anomalous word fits the general context. We asked whether anomalies that are missed elicit an ERP that could be taken as indicating unconscious recognition, and whether both types elicit an N400 effect when they are detected. We found that difficul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
127
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
25
127
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, we predict that N400 amplitude does not correlate with the overall plausibility of a sentence if priming by preceding words and context is taken into account. A fine example consistent with this prediction was presented in the previous paragraph (i.e., the example taken from Sanford et al, 2011). This contrasts with the integration view which attributes the N400 to compositional and integrative processes, and therefore predicts N400 amplitude to be highly sensitive to plausibility.…”
Section: Predictions and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, we predict that N400 amplitude does not correlate with the overall plausibility of a sentence if priming by preceding words and context is taken into account. A fine example consistent with this prediction was presented in the previous paragraph (i.e., the example taken from Sanford et al, 2011). This contrasts with the integration view which attributes the N400 to compositional and integrative processes, and therefore predicts N400 amplitude to be highly sensitive to plausibility.…”
Section: Predictions and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…If participants do not detect the anomaly, no such P600-effect should be observed, because the representations for the critical and control sentences should be equally difficult to build. Sanford et al (2011) recently conducted an ERP investigation of the 'Moses Illusion'. They presented participants with fragments like:…”
Section: Semantic Illusions Revisitedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P600 effect elicited by semantic incongruity has also been repeatedly reported in previous studies (e.g., Kuperberg et al, 2007;Nieuwland & Van Berkum, 2005;Szewczyk & Schriefers, 2011). Such semantic violations involved verbargument violations (Kuperberg, 2007) and hard-to-detect semantic violations (Brouwer, Fitz, & Hoeks, 2012;Sanford, Leuthold, Bohan, & Sanford, 2011). Szewczyk and Schriefers (2011) interpreted the P600 effect as a reflection of general reanalysis or a well-formedness check of the sentence.…”
Section: Emotionality Modulation On Semantic Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, semantically anomalous words that are considered hard to detect because of their strong superficial relatedness to the described scenario (e.g., "Child abuse cases are being reported much more frequently these days. In a recent trial, a 10-year sentence was given to the victim") elicit a reduced N400 effect but enhanced subsequent positive deflections (Sanford, Leuthold, Bohan, & Sanford, 2011;Nieuwland & Van Berkum, 2005). Such effects could indicate that critical words that are not immediately detected as being anomalous nevertheless elicit a second, more elaborate interpretive process upon detection (see also Van Herten, Chwilla, & Kolk, 2006; for a review, see Brouwer, Fitz, & Hoeks, 2012).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%