Annular Core Experiments in HTTR’s Start-Up Core Physics Tests

Fujimoto, Nozomu; Yamashita, Kiyonobu; Nojiri, Naoki; Takeuchi, Mituo; Fujisaki, Shingo; Nakano, Mikio

doi:10.13182/nse03-79

Cited by 11 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The schematic view of HTR-10 core configuration and reached thorough conclusions on its power density distribution by different manners, including deterministic codes like VSOP, 12 and Monte Carlo codes like mammoth, 13 MVP. 14 However, little attention has been paid to the size of pebbles and the size of the central graphite column, which both are important geometry parameters for annular core pebble-bed HTR. In this paper, we present the effects of such parameters on the nuclear heating power density distribution by establishing several high-fidelity models.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The central graphite column consists of dummy pebbles, surrounded by the randomly mixed dummy and fuel pebbles, making the geometry more sophisticated, which cannot be simply normalized when modelling. Former studies have investigated the usual initial pebble‐bed reactor with 10 or without 11 annular core configuration and reached thorough conclusions on its power density distribution by different manners, including deterministic codes like VSOP, 12 and Monte Carlo codes like mammoth, 13 MVP 14 . However, little attention has been paid to the size of pebbles and the size of the central graphite column, which both are important geometry parameters for annular core pebble‐bed HTR.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of the central graphite column dimension and pebble size on power density distribution in annular core pebble‐bed HTR

Yang

Gui

Huang

et al. 2022

Intl J of Energy Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Pebble‐bed HTR utilizes the configuration of randomly distributed graphite and fuel pebbles which contain randomly dispersed TRISO particles, causing the double heterogeneity effect and making simulation get complicated. To establish a high‐fidelity whole core model of the annular core pebble‐bed HTR, this article proposes a two‐step whole core modelling scheme with flexibility. This scheme is verified by comparing the HTR‐10 initial critical benchmark results with the HTR‐10 experiment results. Based on the geometry modelling method and Monte Carlo simulation, this study investigates the effect of the central graphite column dimension and the pebble size upon the nuclear heating power density distribution in annular core pebble‐bed HTR. Results show that the annular core reactor has a more edgy distribution of neutron flux and nuclear heating power density and a higher peak value, compared with the cylindrical configuration core reactor. The annular core reactors with a higher thermal power could realize a higher helium outlet temperature with a precondition that the outlet helium flow is carefully separated and mixed. Accordingly, a higher thermoelectric conversion efficiency could be achieved. Reactors filled with smaller pebbles reach the criticality more quickly. However, the radius of the pebbles in the range from 2.5 to 3.5 cm does less effect than the size of the central graphite column does to the neutron flux and nuclear heating power density distribution. The running‐in phase of the annular configuration core reactor is investigated in the last section. The heating power density gradually flattens as the initial core pebbles fall and new fuel pebbles are loaded into the cavity. In this running‐in phase, we adopt a one‐to‐one mapping technique that sets the temperature of pebbles to their real value, varying from their locations. This enables us to do further work of the neutronics/thermal‐hydraulics analysis and the dynamic simulation which fit the realistic engineering practice, and to explore the fuel management scheme of the annular core high‐temperature gas‐cooled pebble‐bed reactor.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%