Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) performance of doctors who passed Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board (PLAB) tests compared with UK medical graduates: national data linkage study

Abstract

Objective To determine whether use of the Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board (PLAB) examination system used to grant registration for international medical graduates results in equivalent postgraduate medical performance, as evaluated at Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP), between UK based doctors who qualified overseas and those who obtained their primary medical qualification from UK universities.Design Observational study linking ARCP outcome data from the UK deaneries with PLAB test performance and demographic data held by the UK General Medical Council (GMC).Setting Doctors in postgraduate training for a medical specialty or general practice in the UK and doctors obtaining GMC registration via the PLAB system. Participants 53 436 UK based trainee doctors with at least one competency related ARCP outcome reported during the study period, of whom 42 017 were UK medical graduates and 11 419 were international medical graduates who were registered following a pass from the PLAB route.Main outcome measure Probability of obtaining a poorer versus a more satisfactory category of outcome at ARCP following successful registration as a doctor in the UK. ResultsInternational medical graduates were more likely to obtain a less satisfactory outcome at ARCP compared with UK graduates. This finding persisted even after adjustment for the potential influence of sex, age, years of UK based practice, and ethnicity and exclusion of outcomes associated with postgraduate examination failure (odds ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.30 to 2.06). However, international medical graduates who scored in the highest twelfth at part 1 of the PLAB (at least 32 points above the pass mark) had ARCP outcomes that did not differ significantly from those of UK graduates.Conclusions These findings suggest that the PLAB test used for registration of international medical graduates is not generally equivalent to the requirements for UK graduates. The differences in postgraduate performance, as captured at ARCP, following the two routes to registration might be levelled out by raising the standards of English language competency required as well as the pass marks for the two parts of the PLAB test. An alternative might be to introduce a different testing system. IntroductionThe healthcare workforce is becoming increasingly international and globalised. 1 In the United Kingdom in 2012, 37% of the doctors registered with the national medical regulator, the General Medical Council (GMC), had qualified in other countries; 27% had obtained their medical degree from outside the European Economic Area (EEA).2 Before their names are placed on the GMC's List of Registered Medical Practitioners, allowing the doctor to legally practise medicine in the UK, all doctors must fulfil the criteria laid out in the 1983 Medical Act. 3 For international medical graduates, several routes to such registration exist (box 1).To take the Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board (PLAB) test (box 2), international medical graduates ...

Impact of performance in a mandatory postgraduate surgical examination on selection into specialty training

“…In keeping with other studies22, 23, 24, 25, these results suggest that candidates who require multiple attempts at a postgraduate medical examination are more likely to struggle with other medical assessment processes (in this case, assessment via a selection process). This information may identify doctors who will require additional support through their training and guide national bodies when considering borderline candidates or appeals.…”

“…For example, McDougle and colleagues23 compared graduates who initially failed Step 1 of the USMLE ® with those who passed it first time, finding that the relative risk of not being specialty board certified was 2·2. Multiple attempts at the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) have also been associated with an increased risk of failing Step 2 of the USMLE ®24 , whereas multiple attempts at the Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board (PLAB) test have been shown to be independently predictive of unsatisfactory training performance25. The relationship between the number of attempts required to pass a postgraduate UK medical examination and performance in other medical assessments is unknown, but one study17 found that as the number of attempts at each part of the MRCP examination increased, final passing score decreased.…”

PLAB and UK graduates' performance on MRCP(UK) and MRCGP examinations: data linkage study

“…For the present study the yardstick is performance in the MRCGP and MRCP(UK) examinations, and the yardstick of the Annual Review of Competence Progression is analysed in a separate report by a different team. 25 The logic of the current study is straightforward: MRCP(UK) and MRCGP exams are taken by both UK and PLAB graduates, and if the UK and PLAB graduates are equivalent in their outcomes then they should perform equally well when they take the MRCP(UK) and MRCGP. The situation is made somewhat more complex as UK and PLAB graduates choose which medical specialty to enter, and they are also selected onto training programmes such as for general practice or for core medical training.…”

Licensing exams and judicial review: the closing of one door and opening of others?

“…Board (PLAB) exam before applying for GP specialty training. Two recent studies looking at the predictive validity of the PLAB exam in relation to MRCP and the MRCGP outcomes, 3 and Annual Review of Competence Progression outcomes in a variety of medical specialties 5 have concluded that the current standard of PLAB is set too low, and is below the competency level expected for a UK graduate completing foundation Year 1 training. Doctors who are not equivalent at entry to GP specialty training are likely to struggle with the MRCGP unless they receive training that addresses their specific needs.…”