Annual review of Asian American psychology, 2010.

Okazaki, Sumie; Kassem, Ahmed M.; Tan, Judy Y.

doi:10.1037/a0026626

Cited by 17 publications

(110 citation statements)

References 278 publications

(362 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

104

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As was the case with all of the previous reviews (Juan et al, 2012;B. S. K. Kim et al, 2010;Okazaki et al, 2011;Wei et al, 2014;Yeh et al, 2013), two subtopics continued to draw scholarly attention: cancer screening and management (n = 15; e.g., K. E. Kim, Chandrasekar, & Lam, 2014) and substance use (n = 26; e.g., S. S. Kim, Lee, Kiang, Kalman, & Ziedonis, 2014). We used Yeh et al's (2013) and Wei et al's (2014) label of viruses: hepatitis B virus (HBV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and human papillomavirus (HPV) to categorize virus-related articles (n = 7; e.g., Tokes et al, 2014).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 49%

“…As in previous reviews (Juan et al, 2012;B. S. K. Kim et al, 2010;Okazaki et al, 2011;Wei et al, 2014), parenting practices and family relationships continued to be the main focus of studies on families (n = 13). Consistent with B. S. K. Kim et al (2010), we also identified a subtopic on language issues (n = 2).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 86%

“…Similar to Wei et al's (2014) and Juan et al's (2012) reviews, our review groups articles based on their topical similarity, rather than by grade levels, as in Okazaki et al's (2011) review. Articles published in 2014 in this topic area could generally be divided into three categories: academic success and barriers (n = 5;Duong, Schwartz, & McCarty, 2014;Henfield, Woo, Lin, & Rausch, 2014;Hsin & Xie, 2014;E.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…S. K. Kim et al, 2010;Okazaki et al, 2011;Wei et al, 2014;Yeh et al, 2013), health and health-related behaviors was the most frequently studied topic in 2014. A total of 85 articles focused primarily on this topic.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the four searches we conducted, the ethnicity (Juan et al, 2012, p. 198). Additionally, per Okazaki et al (2011) and all subsequent reviews, we excluded articles on Asians residing in Canada, articles in nonEnglish language journals and theoretical papers. Articles that were published in print or through advanced online publication in 2014 were included in this review.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Annual review of Asian American Psychology, 2013.

Wei¹,

Carrera²,

Li³

2014

Asian American Journal of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This 2014 review of Asian American psychology is the sixth review in the series. It includes 316 articles that met the inclusion criteria established by the past five annual reviews. Featured articles were derived from three sources: 137 were generated via the search term "Asian American" in PyscINFO, 111 were generated via a search for specific Asian American ethnic groups, and 32 were generated via author searches of articles that met the inclusion criteria. The top primary topic was health and health-related behaviors, the most frequently employed study design was crosssectional, and the most studied Asian American ethnic group was Chinese. This year's review includes information on the target population of the primary topic, the age range and developmental period of participants, and whether the study design was cross-sectional or longitudinal. It also identifies top authors and journals contributing to the 2014 annual review. These new features reveal that the most common target population of the primary topic was Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to Su Yeong Kim, Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, 108 E Dean Keeton St., Stop A2702, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712. su.yeong.kim@utexas.edu. HHS Public Access Author manuscriptAsian Am J Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01. Published in final edited form as:Asian Am J Psychol. 2015 December ; 6(4): 291-332. doi:10.1037/aap0000031. Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript youths; studies most commonly included emerging adults ages 18-25; cross-sectional study design was employed more often than longitudinal design; the top contributor to the 2014 review was Stephen Chen, who authored the highest number of papers included; and the Asian American Journal of Psychology generated the highest number of publications for this review. Keywords review; Asian Americans, 2014The annual review of Asian American psychology facilitates a comprehensive, year-to-year understanding of the field by summarizing the major research topics and methodology used in Asian American psychology. Comparison of multiple annual reviews reveals past, current, and emerging trends. Illuminating these trends can be informative for new and experienced scholars alike, who can utilize the reviews to synthesize past and current research. This will help them identify emerging trends in order to plan future research that will make a meaningful contribution to scholarship on Asian American psychology. The present annual review uses the format established by the past five annual reviews, with the addition of new features for future annual reviews to consider. Like past reviews, the current issue presents major trends by primary topic, methodological design, and participant characteristics (e.g., average age and ethnicity). This review contributes a developmental perspective by including age range and developmental period in our categorization of participants, and by considering cross-...

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 49%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 86%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Annual review of Asian American Psychology, 2013.

Wei¹,

Carrera²,

Li³

2014

Asian American Journal of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Conflict‐Handling Behaviors of Korean Immigrants in the United States

Choi

2016

Conflict Resolution Qtrly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although there is a great deal of literature that has focused on confl icts faced by monocultural people, cross-cultural confl ict scholars have not yet focused on the confl icts faced by bicultural people. Th is topic deserves more study as cultural clashes-confl icts between foreign-born residents and Americans-are prevalent. Considering the number of the immigrants in the United States and the speed of globalization, more confl icts could arise not only in the workplace, but also anywhere else, such as between neighbors, coworkers, colleagues, peers, and even among intercultural family members. Th erefore, in order to prepare for this type of confl ict, this research examined confl ict-handling behaviors of bicultural people. Among many immigrants, this study focused on Korean immigrants in the United States through the Confl ict Communication Scale ( CCS ) and compared the results with nationality, the amount of time that the immigrants have lived in the United States, the level of acculturation, and gender.

show abstract

Annual review of Asian American Psychology, 2009.

Kim¹,

Wong²,

Maffini³

2010

Asian American Journal of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This 2014 review of Asian American psychology is the sixth review in the series. It includes 316 articles that met the inclusion criteria established by the past five annual reviews. Featured articles were derived from three sources: 137 were generated via the search term "Asian American" in PyscINFO, 111 were generated via a search for specific Asian American ethnic groups, and 32 were generated via author searches of articles that met the inclusion criteria. The top primary topic was health and health-related behaviors, the most frequently employed study design was crosssectional, and the most studied Asian American ethnic group was Chinese. This year's review includes information on the target population of the primary topic, the age range and developmental period of participants, and whether the study design was cross-sectional or longitudinal. It also identifies top authors and journals contributing to the 2014 annual review. These new features reveal that the most common target population of the primary topic was youths; studies most commonly included emerging adults ages 18-25; cross-sectional study design was employed more often than longitudinal design; the top contributor to the 2014 review was Stephen Chen, who authored the highest number of papers included; and the Asian American Journal of Psychology generated the highest number of publications for this review. Keywords review; Asian Americans, 2014The annual review of Asian American psychology facilitates a comprehensive, year-to-year understanding of the field by summarizing the major research topics and methodology used in Asian American psychology. Comparison of multiple annual reviews reveals past, current, and emerging trends. Illuminating these trends can be informative for new and experienced scholars alike, who can utilize the reviews to synthesize past and current research. This will help them identify emerging trends in order to plan future research that will make a meaningful contribution to scholarship on Asian American psychology. The present annual review uses the format established by the past five annual reviews, with the addition of new features for future annual reviews to consider. Like past reviews, the current issue presents major trends by primary topic, methodological design, and participant characteristics (e.g., average age and ethnicity). This review contributes a developmental perspective by including age range and developmental period in our categorization of participants, and by considering cross-sectional versus longitudinal study designs. We are also the first to recognize the top authors and journal outlets in this year's review.The 2014 review of Asian American psychology includes 316 articles, more than were included in any of the past five annual reviews. A confluence of factors has contributed to the growth of scholarship on Asian American psychology. First, there is the size of the population: Asian Americans represent 5.6% of the United States population; of all racial groups in the United States, Asian American...

show abstract

Annual review of Asian American psychology, 2010.

Cited by 17 publications

References 278 publications

Annual review of Asian American Psychology, 2013.

Annual review of Asian American Psychology, 2013.

Conflict‐Handling Behaviors of Korean Immigrants in the United States

Annual review of Asian American Psychology, 2009.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About